Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the survival outcomes between retrocolic and antecolic Roux-en-Y reconstruction after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Honda, Michitaka; Ri, Motonari; Kinoshita, Takahiro; Kawakubo, Hirofumi; Aizawa, Masaki; Bamba, Takeo; Matsuda, Satoru; Kawamura, Hidetaka; Yoshida, Mitsumasa; Nunobe, Souya.
Afiliação
  • Honda M; Department of Surgery Southern Tohoku General Hospital Koriyama Japan.
  • Ri M; Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology Fukushima Medical University Fukushima Japan.
  • Kinoshita T; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan.
  • Kawakubo H; Department of Gastric Surgery National Cancer Center Hospital East Kashiwa Japan.
  • Aizawa M; Department of Surgery Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
  • Bamba T; Department of Digestive Surgery Niigata Cancer Center Hospital Niigata Japan.
  • Matsuda S; Department of Digestive Surgery Niigata Cancer Center Hospital Niigata Japan.
  • Kawamura H; Department of Surgery Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
  • Yoshida M; Department of Surgery Southern Tohoku General Hospital Koriyama Japan.
  • Nunobe S; Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology Fukushima Medical University Fukushima Japan.
Ann Gastroenterol Surg ; 8(3): 443-449, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38707226
ABSTRACT

Background:

There are two methods of Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction after gastrectomy the antecolic route (ACR) and retrocolic route (RCR). There is no evidence to support that the ACR achieves comparable long-term survival.

Methods:

This was a multi-center historical cohort study. Patients diagnosed with clinical T3/4a and any N stage who underwent open gastrectomy and R0 resection for gastric adenocarcinoma between January 2006 and December 2012 were enrolled. The primary outcome was the hazard ratio of ACR for overall survival, with adjustment for confounding factors by propensity score matching, and a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results:

A total of 1758 eligible patients were identified from the database. After matching, 410 patients in the ACR and RCR groups were included in the final analysis. The adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for ACR was 1.148 (0.870-1.492). The five-year survival rates in the ACR and RCR groups were 74.3% (69.5-78.4) and 77.3% (72.3-81.2), respectively. The short-term surgical outcomes of the two groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent.

Conclusion:

The route used to lift the jejunum in RY reconstruction did not affect the incidence of long-term survival or postoperative complications. The ACR and RCR are both acceptable options for RY reconstruction during gastric cancer surgery.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Gastroenterol Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Gastroenterol Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article