Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The potential and paradoxes of eHealth research for digitally marginalised groups: A qualitative meta-review.
Coetzer, Jessica A; Loukili, Ibrahim; Goedhart, Nicole S; Ket, Johannes C F; Schuitmaker-Warnaar, Tjerk Jan; Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun; Dedding, Christine.
Afiliação
  • Coetzer JA; Athena Institute, Faculty of Science, VU University, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.a.coetzer@vu.nl.
  • Loukili I; Department of Ethics, Law & Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1089a, F-vleugel medische faculteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: i.loukili@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Goedhart NS; Department of Ethics, Law & Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1089a, F-vleugel medische faculteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: n.s.goedhart@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Ket JCF; VUmc, Medische Bibliotheek, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: h.ket@vu.nl.
  • Schuitmaker-Warnaar TJ; Athena Institute, Faculty of Science, VU University, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: t.j.schuitmaker@vu.nl.
  • Zuiderent-Jerak T; Athena Institute, Faculty of Science, VU University, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: teun.zuiderent-jerak@vu.nl.
  • Dedding C; Department of Ethics, Law & Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1089a, F-vleugel medische faculteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: c.dedding@amsterdamumc.nl.
Soc Sci Med ; 350: 116895, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710135
ABSTRACT
Whilst the transformation towards digital healthcare is accelerating, there is still a substantial risk of excluding people with a distance to the online world. Groups like people with a low socioeconomic position, people with a migrant background or the elderly, who are already most at risk of experiencing health inequalities, are simultaneously experiencing increased digital exclusion. Researchers play a role in determining how eHealth access is framed and can thus impact how the barriers to its use are addressed. This qualitative meta-review critically evaluates the way researchers (as authors) discuss eHealth use in digitally marginalised groups. Specifically, it seeks to understand how eHealth is framed to address existing health systems problems; how the barriers to eHealth use are presented and which solutions are provided in response; and who authors suggest should be responsible for making eHealth work. The results of this review found four paradoxes in how current literature views eHealth use. Firstly, that health systems problems are complex and nuanced, yet eHealth is seen as a simple answer. Secondly, that there are many political, social and health systems-based solutions suggested to address eHealth use, however most of the identified barriers are individually framed. This focus on personal deficits results in misallocating responsibility for making these systemic improvements. Thirdly, although eHealth is meant to simplify the tasks of patients and healthcare workers, these are the groups most often burdened with the responsibility of ensuring its success. Lastly, despite tailoring eHealth to the user being the most suggested solution, researchers generally speak about groups as a homogenous entity - thus rendering tailoring difficult. Ultimately, this review finds that a shift to focus research on addressing systemic issues on a systems level is necessary to prevent further exacerbating existing health inequalities.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telemedicina / Pesquisa Qualitativa Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Soc Sci Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telemedicina / Pesquisa Qualitativa Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Soc Sci Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article
...