Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Emergency front-of-neck access in cardiac arrest: A scoping review.
Aljanoubi, Mohammed; Almazrua, Abdulkarim A; Johnson, Samantha; Drennan, Ian R; Reynolds, Joshua C; Soar, Jasmeet; Couper, Keith.
Afiliação
  • Aljanoubi M; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
  • Almazrua AA; Prince Sultan bin Abdul Aziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Johnson S; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
  • Drennan IR; Prince Sultan bin Abdul Aziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Reynolds JC; The Library, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
  • Soar J; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Couper K; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Resusc Plus ; 18: 100653, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716381
ABSTRACT

Background:

Airway management is a core component of the treatment of cardiac arrest. Where a rescuer cannot establish a patent airway to provide oxygenation and ventilation using standard basic and advanced airway techniques, there may be a need to consider emergency front-of-neck airway access (eFONA, e.g., cricothyroidotomy), but there is limited evidence to inform this approach.

Objectives:

This scoping review aims to identify the evidence for the use of eFONA techniques in patients with cardiac arrest.

Methods:

In November 2023, we searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central to identify studies on eFONA in adults. We included randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies, and case series with at least five cases that described any use of eFONA. We extracted data, including study setting, population characteristics, intervention characteristics, and outcomes. Our analysis focused on four key areas incidence of eFONA, eFONA success rates, clinical outcomes, and complications.

Results:

The search identified 21,565 papers, of which 18,934 remained after de-duplication. After screening, we included 69 studies (53 reported incidence, 40 reported success rate, 38 reported clinical outcomes; 36 studies reported complications). We identified only one randomised controlled trial. Across studies, there was a total of 4,457 eFONA attempts, with a median of 31 attempts (interquartile range 16-56.5) per study. There was marked heterogeneity across studies that precluded any pooling of data. There were no studies that included only patients in cardiac arrest.

Conclusion:

The available evidence for eFONA is extremely heterogeneous, with no studies specifically focusing on its use in adults with cardiac arrest.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Resusc Plus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Resusc Plus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido