Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women taking oral probiotic undergoing cerclage compared to placebo: two blinded randomized controlled trial.
Vanda, Raziyeh; Dastani, Tahora; Taghavi, Seyed-Abdolvahab; Sadeghi, Hossein; Lambert, Nicky; Bazarganipour, Fatemeh.
Afiliação
  • Vanda R; Gynecologic and Obstetrics Department, School of Medicine, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
  • Dastani T; Gynecologic and Obstetrics Department, School of Medicine, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
  • Taghavi SA; Medicinal Plants Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
  • Sadeghi H; Medicinal Plants Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
  • Lambert N; Department of Mental Health and Social Work, Middlesex University, London, UK.
  • Bazarganipour F; Medicinal Plants Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran. f.bazarganipour@gmail.com.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 311, 2024 May 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724897
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the oral probiotic effect on pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women undergoing cerclage compared to placebo.

METHODS:

This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial undertaken in Yasuj, Iran. 114 eligible participants who have undergone cerclage were randomly divided to either receive probiotic adjuvant or 17α-OHP (250 mg, IM) with placebo from the 16th -37th week of pregnancy by "block" randomization method. Our primary outcomes were preterm labor (PTB) (late and early) and secondary outcomes were other obstetrical and neonatal outcomes included preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM), pre-labor rupture of membranes (PROM), mode of delivery, and neonatal outcomes including anthropometric characterize and Apgar score (one and fifth-minute).

RESULTS:

Results show that there are no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of PTB in < 34th (15.51% vs. 17.86%; P = 0.73) and 34-37th weeks of pregnancy (8.7% vs. 16.1%; P = 0.22), and mode of delivery (P = 0.09). PPROM (8.7% vs. 28.5%; P = 0.006) PROM (10.3% vs. 25%; P = 0.04) was significantly lower in patients receiving probiotic adjuvant compared to the control group. After delivery, the findings of the present study showed that there were no significant differences in newborn's weight (3082.46 ± 521.8vs. 2983.89 ± 623.89), head circumstance (36.86 ± 1.53vs. 36.574 ± 1.52), height (45.4 ± 5.34 vs. 47.33 ± 4.92) and Apgar score in one (0.89 ± 0.03 vs. 0.88 ± 0.05) and five minutes (0.99 ± 0.03vs. 0.99 ± 0.03) after birth.

CONCLUSION:

Our result has shown that the consumption of Lactofem probiotic from the 16th week until 37th of pregnancy can lead to a reduction of complications such as PPROM and PROM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resultado da Gravidez / Probióticos / Cerclagem Cervical Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Assunto da revista: OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irã País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resultado da Gravidez / Probióticos / Cerclagem Cervical Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Assunto da revista: OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irã País de publicação: Reino Unido