Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The economic impact of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: a systematic review.
Nijssen, David J; Wienholts, Kiedo; Postma, Maarten J; Tuynman, Jurriaan; Bemelman, Willem A; Laméris, Wytze; Hompes, Roel.
Afiliação
  • Nijssen DJ; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.nijssen@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Wienholts K; Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.nijssen@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Postma MJ; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Tuynman J; Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bemelman WA; Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Laméris W; Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Hompes R; Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 55, 2024 May 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769231
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a burdensome complication following colorectal surgery, with increased morbidity, oncological compromise, and mortality. AL may impose a substantial financial burden on hospitals and society due to extensive resource utilization. Estimated costs associated with AL are important when exploring preventive measures and treatment strategies. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the existing literature on (socio)economic costs associated with AL after colorectal surgery, appraise their quality, compare reported outcomes, and identify knowledge gaps.

METHODS:

Health economic evaluations reporting costs related to AL after colorectal surgery were identified through searching multiple online databases until June 2023. Pairs of reviewers independently evaluated the quality using an adapted version of the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list. Extracted costs were converted to 2022 euros (€) and also adjusted for purchasing power disparities among countries.

RESULTS:

From 1980 unique abstracts, 59 full-text publications were assessed for eligibility, and 17 studies were included in the review. The incremental costs of AL after correcting for purchasing power disparity ranged from €2250 (+39.9%, Romania) to €83,633 (+ 513.1%, Brazil). Incremental costs were mainly driven by hospital (re)admission, intensive care stay, and reinterventions. Only one study estimated the economic societal burden of AL between €1.9 and €6.1 million.

CONCLUSIONS:

AL imposes a significant financial burden on hospitals and social care systems. The magnitude of costs varies greatly across countries and data on the societal burden and non-medical costs are scarce. Adherence to international reporting standards is essential to understand international disparities and to externally validate reported cost estimates.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fístula Anastomótica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Tech Coloproctol Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fístula Anastomótica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Tech Coloproctol Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Itália