Diagnostic yield of bone marrow aspiration in paediatric primary immune thrombocytopenia: impact of evolution and adherence to medical guidelines over the last 25 years.

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to analyse the diagnostic value of bone marrow aspiration (BMA) in a retrospective cohort of patients with suspected immune thrombocytopaenia (ITP). We further measure changes in the percentage of patients who underwent this study and whether testing or not was in accordance with current guidelines at the time of diagnosis. We conducted a chart review of 243 patients with ITP who underwent follow-up in our institution between 1995 and 2022. The patients were divided into historical cohorts based on the practice guidelines of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (SEHOP) and the American Society of Hematology (ASH) in place at the time of follow-up. For each case, time of disease presentation or initial diagnosis was defined as that which occurred in the first 72 h following disease onset. Based on data from the historical cohorts studied, we observed a lower total number of BMAs at diagnosis over time (p < 0.005). A gradual reduction was seen in the number of BMAs with the introduction of guidelines, including a progressively lower number of BMAs performed without indication (p < 0.05). Subsequent to the initial diagnosis, the procedure played a decisive role in only 2 patients (0.58%), allowing for a diagnosis of acquired aplastic anaemia in both cases. In both of them on diagnosis, BMA did not appear to be indicated, although subsequent analysis after 72 h raised suspicion of bone marrow failure. CONCLUSION: BMA at presentation did not significantly alter the diagnosis in our cohort of patients with an initial suspicion of ITP, although the procedure was decisive in diagnosing 2 cases of acquired aplastic anaemia during the subsequent course of the disease. Regarding the number of aspirations performed, our findings show that increased physician compliance with current guidelines reduced the rate of unnecessary BMAs. WHAT IS KNOWN • BMA is a supplementary test for the diagnosis of ITP. • The usefulness of this invasive diagnostic procedure is not clearly stated in current guidelines. WHAT IS NEW • Adjustments to scientific guidelines have led to a reduction in the number of BMAs performed on our patients with suspected ITP in the last 27 years. • While the risks and benefits of BMA at the time of diagnosis are unclear in patients with suspected ITP, the procedure does not contribute significant information to support the diagnosis.