Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
European Organisation for Caries Research and the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry Consensus Report on Clinical Recommendations for Caries Diagnosis: Paper III - Caries Diagnosis at the Individual Level.
Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte; Fontana, Margherita; Lussi, Adrian; Jablonski-Momeni, Anahita; Banerjee, Avijit; Ricketts, David; Schwendicke, Falk; Mendes, Fausto Medeiros; Douglas, Gail; Schmalz, Gottfried; Campus, Guglielmo; Aps, Johan; Horner, Keith; Neuhaus, Klaus W; van der Veen, Monique Harriët; Opdam, Niek; Doméjean, Sophie; Martignon, Stefania; Kühnisch, Jan; Splieth, Christian H.
Afiliação
  • Huysmans MC; Department of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Fontana M; Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Lussi A; Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, University Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Jablonski-Momeni A; School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Banerjee A; Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
  • Ricketts D; Conservative and MI Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Schwendicke F; Unit of Restorative Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
  • Mendes FM; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Douglas G; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Schmalz G; Department of Dental Public Health, University of Leeds School of Dentistry, Leeds, UK.
  • Campus G; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Aps J; Department of Periodontology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Horner K; Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, Zahnmedizinische Kliniken (ZMK), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Neuhaus KW; Department of Surgery, Microsurgery and Medicine Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
  • van der Veen MH; OpiniDent BV, Kortrijk, Belgium.
  • Opdam N; Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
  • Doméjean S; Department of Pediatric Oral Health, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel (UZB), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Martignon S; Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Kühnisch J; Departments of Preventive Dentistry and Paediatric Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Splieth CH; Oral Hygiene School, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caries Res ; 58(5): 521-532, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776884
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of the present consensus paper was to provide recommendations for clinical practice on the individual etiological and modifying factors to be assessed in the individual diagnosis of caries, and the methods for their assessment, supporting personalized treatment decisions. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

The executive councils of the European Organisation for Caries Research (ORCA) and the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry (EFCD) nominated ten experts each to join the expert panel. The steering committee formed three work groups which were asked to provide recommendations on (1) caries detection and diagnostic methods, (2) caries activity assessment, and (3) forming individualized caries diagnoses. The experts responsible for "individualised caries diagnosis" searched and evaluated the relevant literature, drafted this manuscript and made provisional consensus recommendations. These recommendations were discussed and refined during the structured process in the whole work group. Finally, the agreement for each recommendation was determined using an anonymous eDelphi survey. The threshold for approval of recommendations was determined at 70% agreement.

RESULTS:

Ten recommendations were approved and agreed by the whole expert panel, covering medical history, caries experience, plaque, diet, fluoride, and saliva. While the level of evidence was low, the level of agreement was typically very high, except for one recommendation on salivary flow measurement, where 70% agreed.

CONCLUSION:

It is recommended that all aspects of caries lesion progression and activity, recent caries experience, medical conditions and medications, plaque, diet, fluoride and saliva should be synthesized to arrive at an individual diagnosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The expert panel merged evidence from existing guidelines and scientific literature with practical considerations and provided recommendations for their use in daily dental practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cárie Dentária / Consenso Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Caries Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cárie Dentária / Consenso Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Caries Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Suíça