Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of early and late removal of the urinary catheter after rectal cancer surgery.
Kivilcim-Uprak, Tevfik; Ciciboga, Kaan; Eren-Kayaci, Ayse; Attaallah, Wafi.
Afiliação
  • Kivilcim-Uprak T; Department of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Ciciboga K; Department of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Eren-Kayaci A; Department of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Attaallah W; Department of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cir Cir ; 92(2): 189-193, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782384
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study is aiming to compare the results of early and late removal of urinary catheters after rectal cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Patients who undergone rectal cancer surgery in a single center were included in this prospective randomized study. The timing of the urinary catheter removal was randomized by a computer-assisted program and divided into 2 groups, which are early (first 48 h) and late (after 48 h). The primary outcome of this study was to compare the urinary retention and re-catheterization rates between patients with early and those with late catheter removal.

RESULTS:

Sixty-six patients were included in this study. The median age was 60 (31-88 years), and the patient group was predominantly male (n 40, 60.9%). Urinary retention after catheter removal developed in 8 (12%) of 66 patients. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of the need for re-catheterization (14% vs. 10%, p 0.63). All the patients who required re-catheterization (n 8) and were discharged with a urinary catheter (n 4) were male. When the male and female patients were evaluated separately, there was no difference in urinary retention in the early or late groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Early or late removal of the catheter does not play a role in the development of urinary retention in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery.
RESUMEN

OBJETIVO:

Comparar los resultados de la retirada precoz y tardía de la sonda urinaria tras la cirugía de cáncer rectal.

MÉTODO:

Estudio prospectivo aleatorizado que incluyó pacientes sometidos a cirugía de cáncer rectal en un único centro. El momento de la retirada de la sonda urinaria se aleatorizó y se dividió en dos grupos primeras 48 horas y después de 48 horas. Se compararon las tasas de retención urinaria y de nueva cateterización entre los pacientes con retirada precoz y tardía de la sonda.

RESULTADOS:

Se incluyeron 66 pacientes, con una mediana de edad de 60 años (31-88 años) y predominio del sexo masculino (n = 40, 60.9%). Se produjo retención urinaria tras la retirada de la sonda en 8 (12%). No hubo diferencias entre los dos grupos en cuanto a necesidad de nueva cateterización (14% frente a 10%, p = 0.63). Todos los pacientes que precisaron un nuevo cateterismo (n = 8) y fueron dados de alta con una sonda urinaria (n = 4) eran varones.

CONCLUSIONES:

La retirada precoz o tardía de la sonda no influye en la aparición de retención urinaria en pacientes intervenidos de cáncer de recto.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias Retais / Cateterismo Urinário / Retenção Urinária / Remoção de Dispositivo / Cateteres Urinários Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cir Cir Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias Retais / Cateterismo Urinário / Retenção Urinária / Remoção de Dispositivo / Cateteres Urinários Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cir Cir Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia