Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity in 97 Hospitalized Patients With Cancer: A Call for Standardization.
McFarland, Daniel; Alici, Yesne; Kostelecky, Natalie T; Voigt, Louis.
Afiliação
  • McFarland D; Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Department of Medicine, Division Hematology and Medical Oncology, Wilmont Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. Electronic address: Danielcurtismcfarland@gmail.com.
  • Alici Y; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Ethics Committee, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
  • Kostelecky NT; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
  • Voigt L; Department of Medicine, Ethics Committee, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Departmen
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38797329
ABSTRACT
Hospitalized patients with cancer face pivotal decisions that will affect their cancer care trajectory and quality of life, but frequently lack decision making capacity (DMC). Standardization is conspicuously missing for inpatient oncology teams and for consultation-liaison psychiatrists performing DMC assessments for patients with cancer. This study sought to characterize a single institutional experience of psychiatric consultations to assess DMC. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 97 consecutive psychiatric consultations for DMC from 2017 to 2019. Demographic, hospital-based, and psychiatry consult differences were assessed based on the reasons for DMC evaluation (uncertainty, patient refusal, and emergency) and whether patients had decisional capacity. Out of 97 consultations, 56 (59%) hospitalized patients with cancer were unable to demonstrate capacity. Consultations came from medical services almost exclusively. Only 5% of primary teams documented their own DMC evaluation. Only 22% of DMC evaluation by consultation-liaison psychiatrists documented four determinates of DMC. Few commented on reversibility or tenuousness of DMC, and the identification of agents/surrogates; however, psychiatry consultants were more likely to follow up on patients without DMC. One-third of patients died in the hospital and two-thirds of patients were deceased 3 months after the consult. Given the substantial heterogeneity in the documentation of DMC evaluations in this retrospective chart review, we call for more rigor and standardization in documentation of DMC evaluations.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article
...