Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of patency rates and complications with or without antithrombotic therapy following portal vein stent placement after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, Lin; Wang, Ziyan; Dong, Liangbo; Wang, Zhiwei; Li, Zehui; Wang, Weibin.
Afiliação
  • Chen L; Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
  • Wang Z; Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
  • Dong L; School of Medicine, Tsinghua University.
  • Wang Z; Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
  • Li Z; Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College.
  • Wang W; Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
Int J Surg ; 110(9): 5771-5780, 2024 Sep 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38818685
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Portal vein stent placement is used for portal vein stenosis. However, reports on postpancreatic surgery cases are rare. Whether antithrombotic therapy should be administered remains controversial. In this paper, the authors reviewed current data to evaluate the influence of antithrombosis on stent patency after pancreatic surgery. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared studies in which patients did or did not receive antithrombotic therapy after portal vein stent placement. The authors compared patency after stent placement and complication rate.

RESULTS:

There were 22 ( n =207) studies in which patients received antithrombotic therapy and 8 ( n =61) in which patients did not receive therapy. Antithrombotic agents, such as aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, and warfarin, were used. The overall patency rates were similar between the groups (79.2% in the antithrombosis group vs. 88.0% in the nonantithrombosis group). Subgroup analyses included those for the etiology of stenosis, types of antithrombotic agents, acute or chronic stenosis, and causes of stent stenosis. None revealed a significant difference between the patency rates in the antithrombosis and nonantithrombosis groups. However, bleeding complications only occurred in patients who received antithrombotic therapy.

CONCLUSION:

There is no significant benefit of antithrombotic therapy after portal vein stent placement following pancreatic surgery. Antithrombotic therapy should be performed with caution because it may cause complications, such as bleeding.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Porta / Stents / Fibrinolíticos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Porta / Stents / Fibrinolíticos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos