Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A practical guide to the implementation of AI in orthopaedic research, Part 6: How to evaluate the performance of AI research?
Oettl, Felix C; Pareek, Ayoosh; Winkler, Philipp W; Zsidai, Bálint; Pruneski, James A; Senorski, Eric Hamrin; Kopf, Sebastian; Ley, Christophe; Herbst, Elmar; Oeding, Jacob F; Grassi, Alberto; Hirschmann, Michael T; Musahl, Volker; Samuelsson, Kristian; Tischer, Thomas; Feldt, Robert.
Afiliação
  • Oettl FC; Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York USA.
  • Pareek A; Schulthess Klinik Zurich Switzerland.
  • Winkler PW; Sports Medicine and Shoulder Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York USA.
  • Zsidai B; Department for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kepler University Hospital GmbH Johannes Kepler University Linz Linz Austria.
  • Pruneski JA; Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
  • Senorski EH; Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center Göteborg Sweden.
  • Kopf S; Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
  • Ley C; Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center Göteborg Sweden.
  • Herbst E; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Tripler Army Medical Center Honolulu Hawaii USA.
  • Oeding JF; Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center Göteborg Sweden.
  • Grassi A; Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
  • Hirschmann MT; Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane Germany.
  • Musahl V; Department of Mathematics University of Luxembourg Esch-sur-Alzette Luxembourg.
  • Samuelsson K; Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery University Hospital Muenster Muenster Germany.
  • Tischer T; Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
  • Feldt R; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA.
J Exp Orthop ; 11(3): e12039, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38826500
ABSTRACT
Artificial intelligence's (AI) accelerating progress demands rigorous evaluation standards to ensure safe, effective integration into healthcare's high-stakes decisions. As AI increasingly enables prediction, analysis and judgement capabilities relevant to medicine, proper evaluation and interpretation are indispensable. Erroneous AI could endanger patients; thus, developing, validating and deploying medical AI demands adhering to strict, transparent standards centred on safety, ethics and responsible oversight. Core considerations include assessing performance on diverse real-world data, collaborating with domain experts, confirming model reliability and limitations, and advancing interpretability. Thoughtful selection of evaluation metrics suited to the clinical context along with testing on diverse data sets representing different populations improves generalisability. Partnering software engineers, data scientists and medical practitioners ground assessment in real needs. Journals must uphold reporting standards matching AI's societal impacts. With rigorous, holistic evaluation frameworks, AI can progress towards expanding healthcare access and quality. Level of Evidence Level V.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Exp Orthop Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Exp Orthop Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos