Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Meta-analysis of new intervention measures for preventing side effects of artificial joint replacement.
Jiang, Wei; Zhu, Ting-Biao.
Afiliação
  • Jiang W; Department of Orthopaedics, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Pingshan, Yibin 645350, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Zhu TB; Department of Orthopaedics, The First People's Hospital of Qujing, Qujing 655099, Yunnan Province, China. 13308748558@163.com.
World J Orthop ; 15(5): 469-476, 2024 May 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835684
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Intertrochanteric fracture of the femur occurs mostly among older people, and seriously affects daily life and quality of life. At present, physical intervention, drug treatment, routine intervention and rehabilitation training are widely used for prevention of side effects, but it is still inconclusive which intervention has the best effect.

AIM:

To compare the effects of new intervention measures for preventing side effects of artificial joint replacement.

METHODS:

We searched the Chinese and English literatures for comparative studies on the prevention of side effects of new interventions for artificial joint replacement from July 2013 to June 2023 in China HowNet, PubMed, Wanfang, Weipu and other databases. Study quality was evaluated by improved Jadad scoring standard, and the effects of different interventions on preventing different complications were analyzed by meta-analysis of evidence-based medicine with Review Manager 5.0 software.

RESULTS:

Ten articles, including 869 cases, were finally included. The preventive effects of different interventions on the side effects of artificial joint replacement were studied, and valid data were extracted. There were two articles on the preventive effects of drug intervention, four on comparison of the preventive effects of combined and single interventions, and three on the preventive effects of physical intervention, rehabilitation training and routine intervention. Meta-analysis showed that the preventive effect of rivaroxaban was significantly better than low molecular weight heparin calcium [mean difference (MD) = -0.16, 95%CI -0.28 to -0.04, P < 0.05]. The effect of combined intervention was significantly better than that of single intervention (MD = -0.08, 95%CI -0.16 to -0.01, P < 0.001). Physical intervention was significantly better than routine intervention and rehabilitation training (MD = 0.26, 95%CI 0.16-0.36, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Rivaroxaban combined with rehabilitation training is preferred for preventing deep vein thrombosis after artificial joint replacement. In the prevention of pulmonary embolism, rivaroxaban drug intervention is given priority. The effect of combined intervention is better than that of single intervention.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: World J Orthop Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: World J Orthop Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Estados Unidos