Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A New Method to Minimize the Standard Deviation and Root Mean Square of the Prediction Error of Single-Optimized IOL Power Formulas.
Gatinel, Damien; Debellemanière, Guillaume; Saad, Alain; Rampat, Radhika; Wallerstein, Avi; Gauvin, Mathieu; Malet, Jacques.
Afiliação
  • Gatinel D; Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Anterior Segment and Refractive Surgery Department, Paris, France.
  • Debellemanière G; Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Anterior Segment and Refractive Surgery Department, Paris, France.
  • Saad A; Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Anterior Segment and Refractive Surgery Department, Paris, France.
  • Rampat R; Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Anterior Segment and Refractive Surgery Department, Paris, France.
  • Wallerstein A; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Gauvin M; LASIK MD, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Malet J; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Transl Vis Sci Technol ; 13(6): 2, 2024 Jun 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38837172
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to develop a simplified method to approximate constants minimizing the standard deviation (SD) and the root mean square (RMS) of the prediction error in single-optimized intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas.

Methods:

The study introduces analytical formulas to determine the optimal constant value for minimizing SD and RMS in single-optimized IOL power calculation formulas. These formulas were tested against various datasets containing biometric measurements from cataractous populations and included 10,330 eyes and 4 different IOL models. The study evaluated the effectiveness of the proposed method by comparing the outcomes with those obtained using traditional reference methods.

Results:

In optimizing IOL constants, minor differences between reference and estimated A-constants were found, with the maximum deviation at -0.086 (SD, SRK/T, and Vivinex) and -0.003 (RMS, PEARL DGS, and Vivinex). The largest discrepancy for third-generation formulas was -0.027 mm (SD, Haigis, and Vivinex) and 0.002 mm (RMS, Hoffer Q, and PCB00/SN60WF). Maximum RMS differences were -0.021 and +0.021, both involving Hoffer Q. Post-minimization, the largest mean prediction error was 0.726 diopters (D; SD) and 0.043 D (RMS), with the highest SD and RMS after adjustments at 0.529 D and 0.875 D, respectively, indicating effective minimization strategies.

Conclusions:

The study simplifies the process of minimizing SD and RMS in single-optimized IOL power predictions, offering a valuable tool for clinicians. However, it also underscores the complexity of achieving balanced optimization and suggests the need for further research in this area. Translational Relevance The study presents a novel, clinically practical approach for optimizing IOL power calculations.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Óptica e Fotônica / Lentes Intraoculares Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transl Vis Sci Technol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Óptica e Fotônica / Lentes Intraoculares Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transl Vis Sci Technol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França País de publicação: Estados Unidos