Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Westerhoff, Jasmijn M; Lalmahomed, Tariq A; Meijers, Lieke T C; Henke, Lauren; Teunissen, Frederik R; Bruynzeel, Anna M E; Alongi, Filippo; Hall, William A; Kishan, Amar U; Intven, Martijn P W; Verkooijen, Helena M; van der Voort van Zyp, Jochem R N; Daamen, Lois A.
Afiliação
  • Westerhoff JM; Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Lalmahomed TA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Meijers LTC; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Henke L; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Teunissen FR; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Bruynzeel AME; Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC (location VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Alongi F; Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
  • Hall WA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Kishan AU; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Intven MPW; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Verkooijen HM; Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • van der Voort van Zyp JRN; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Daamen LA; Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: l.a.daamen-3@umcutrecht.nl.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 120(1): 38-48, 2024 Sep 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838994
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This systematic review provides an overview of literature on the impact of magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with prostate cancer (PC). METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic search was performed in October 2023 in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study design (PICOS) framework was used to determine eligibility criteria. Included were studies assessing PROs following MRgRT for PC with a sample size >10. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies - of Interventions and Cochrane's risk of bias tool for randomized trials. Relevant mean differences (MDs) compared with pre-RT were interpreted using minimal important differences. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

RESULTS:

Eleven observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial (n = 897) were included. Nine studies included patients with primary PC with MRgRT as first-line treatment (n = 813) and 3 with MRgRT as second-line treatment (n = 84). Substantial risk of bias was found in 5 studies. European Organization for Research and Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) core 30 (C30) and EORTC QLQ prostate cancer module (PR25) scores were pooled from 3 studies, and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 scores were pooled from 4 studies. Relevant MDs for the urinary domain were found with the EPIC-26 (MD, -10.0; 95% CI, -12.0 to -8.1; I2 = 0%) and the EORTC QLQ-PR25 (MD, 8.6; 95% CI, -4.7 to 22.0; I2 = 97%), both at end-RT to 1-month follow-up. Relevant MDs for the bowel domain were found with the EPIC-26 (MD, -4.7; 95% CI, -9.2 to -0.2; I2 = 82%) at end-RT or 1-month follow-up, but not with the EORTC QLQ-PR25. For both domains, no relevant MDs were found after 3 months of follow-up. No relevant MDs were found in the general quality of life domains of the EORTC QLQ C30.

CONCLUSIONS:

MRgRT for PC results in a temporary worsening of patient-reported urinary and bowel symptoms during the first month after treatment compared with pre-RT, resolving at 3 months. No clinically relevant changes were found for general quality of life domains. These results provide important information for patient counseling and can serve as a benchmark for future studies.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Qualidade de Vida / Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Qualidade de Vida / Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Estados Unidos