Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Isolated decompression for degenerative spondylolisthesis is less costly than fusion even with high revision rates.
Kaidi, Austin C; Du, Jerry Y; Subramanian, Tejas; Amen, Troy; Asada, Tomoyuki; Qureshi, Sheeraz A; Iyer, Sravisht.
Afiliação
  • Kaidi AC; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
  • Du JY; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
  • Subramanian T; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
  • Amen T; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
  • Asada T; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
  • Qureshi SA; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
  • Iyer S; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: IyerS@hss.edu.
Spine J ; 2024 Jun 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38849052
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Isolated decompression and decompression with instrumented fusion are accepted surgical treatments for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Although isolated decompression is a less costly solution with similar patient-reported outcomes, it is associated with higher rates of re-operation than primary fusion.

PURPOSE:

To determine the costs associated with primary decompression, primary fusion, and decompression and fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. We further sought to establish at what revision rate is primary decompression still a less costly surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. STUDY DESIGN/

SETTING:

A retrospective database study of the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) limited data set. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients who underwent single-level fusion or decompression for degenerative spondylolisthesis. OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Cost of surgical care.

METHODS:

All inpatient stays that underwent surgery for single-level lumbar/lumbosacral degenerative spondylolisthesis in the 2019 calendar year (n=6,653) were queried from the MEDPAR limited data set. Patients were stratified into three cohorts primary decompression (n=300), primary fusion (n=5,757), and revision fusion (n=566). Univariate analysis was conducted to determine cost differences between these groups and results were confirmed with multivariable regression. An economic analysis was then done to determine at what revision rate would primary decompression still be a less costly treatment choice.

RESULTS:

on univariate analysis, the cost of primary single-level decompression for spondylolisthesis was $14,690±9,484, the cost of primary single-level fusion was $26,376±11,967, and revision fusion was $26,686±11,309 (p<0.001). on multivariate analysis, primary fusion was associated with an increased cost of $3,751, and revision fusion was associated with increased cost of $7,502 (95%ci 2,990-4,512, p<0.001). economic analysis found that a revision rate less than or equal to 43.8% would still result in primary decompression being less costly for a practice than primary fusion for all patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

Isolated decompression for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a less costly treatment choice even with rates of revision fusion as high as 43.8%. This was true even with an assumed revision rate of 0% after primary fusion. This study solely looks at cost data, however, and many patients may still benefit from primary fusion when appropriately indicated.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Spine J Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Spine J Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos