Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of a geriatric intervention based on the Comprehensive Geriatrics Assessment on avoidable admissions in older patients at risk evaluated in the Emergency Department.
Fernández-Montalbán, Paula; Martínez-Flores, Sara; Mir-Montero, María; Arribas López, José Ramón; Bibiano-Guillén, Carlos; Brañas, Fátima.
Afiliação
  • Fernández-Montalbán P; Geriatrics Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: pfernandez@salud.mdarid.org.
  • Martínez-Flores S; Geriatrics Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
  • Mir-Montero M; Emergency Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
  • Arribas López JR; Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain; AIDS and Infectious Disease Research Group, IdiPAZ, Spain.
  • Bibiano-Guillén C; Emergency Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
  • Brañas F; Geriatrics Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain; Fundación para la Investigación e Innovación Biomédica del Hosp, Univ. Infanta Leonor y Hospital del Sureste, Spain; Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol ; 59(5): 101512, 2024 Jun 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38852228
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To know the impact of a geriatric intervention based on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) on avoidable admissions in older patients at risk evaluated in the Emergency Department.

METHOD:

Prospective observational unicenter study. We included patients, from October 1, 2018 to January 31, 2020, over 75 years who were attended at the Emergency Department with a Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST) score≥2. All patients were evaluated by a geriatrician through the CGA. The reasons for going to the Emergency room were collected and also the main intervention carried out by Geriatrics, whether admission or discharge was indicated and whether the admission was avoidable. We did a cost analysis calculating this by (bed/day×average stay×number of admissions avoided).

RESULTS:

We included 260 patients, 66% were women and the mean age was 86 years. 73.5% patients had polypharmacy, the mean Charlson index was 2.5 (5.6). 63.3% were independent for walking and 20.8% independent for basic activities of daily living. 59% had cognitive impairment. 91.5% lived at home. The most frequent reason for visiting the Emergency room was decline of general state in 22% and the most frequent intervention carried out by Geriatrics was assistance in the decision making process in 35.4% followed by referral to a preferential outpatient geriatric care circuit in 32.7%. Other interventions carried out by Geriatrics was assistance in clarifying diagnosis (4.2%), assistance in pharmacological adjustment (8.5%), referral to a standard geriatric care pathway (13.1%), telephone follow-up (4.2%) and/or coordination with Social Services for care planning (11.2%). Including all patients, 29.2% required hospital admission and 70.8% were discharged. 40% admissions were avoided, which meant more than 540 thousand euros saved.

CONCLUSIONS:

A standardized CGA coordinated by Geriatrics in older patients at risk of suffering adverse events in the Emergency room reduces admissions and costs, so it should therefore be established as a recommendation of good clinical practice.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article
...