Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Medical Maximizing Preferences and Beliefs About Cancer Among US Adults.
Chiu, Alexander S; Hoxha, Ines; Jensen, Catherine B; Saucke, Megan C; Pitt, Susan C.
Afiliação
  • Chiu AS; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
  • Hoxha I; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
  • Jensen CB; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
  • Saucke MC; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  • Pitt SC; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2417098, 2024 Jun 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38874925
ABSTRACT
Importance Medical overutilization contributes to significant health care expenditures and exposes patients to questionably beneficial surgery and unnecessary risk.

Objectives:

To understand public attitudes toward medical utilization and the association of these attitudes with beliefs about cancer. Design, Setting, and

Participants:

In this cross-sectional survey study conducted from August 26 to October 28, 2020, US-based, English-speaking adults were recruited from the general public using Prolific Academic, a research participant platform. Quota-filling was used to obtain a sample demographically representative of the US population. Adults with a personal history of cancer other than nonmelanoma skin cancer were excluded. Statistical analysis was completed in July 2022. Main Outcome and

Measures:

Medical utilization preferences were characterized with the validated, single-item Maximizer-Minimizer Elicitation Question. Participants preferring to take action in medically ambiguous situations (hereafter referred to as "maximizers") were compared with those who leaned toward waiting and seeing (hereafter referred to as "nonmaximizers"). Beliefs and emotions about cancer incidence, survivability, and preventability were assessed using validated measures. Logistic regression modeled factors associated with preferring to maximize medical utilization.

Results:

Of 1131 participants (mean [SD] age, 45 [16] years; 568 women [50.2%]), 287 (25.4%) were classified as maximizers, and 844 (74.6%) were classified as nonmaximizers. Logistic regression revealed that self-reporting very good or excellent health status (compared with good, fair, or poor; odds ratio [OR], 2.01 [95% CI, 1.52-2.65]), Black race (compared with White race; OR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.22-2.89]), high levels of cancer worry (compared with low levels; OR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.09-2.42]), and overestimating cancer incidence (compared with accurate estimation or underestimating; OR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.09-2.28]) were significantly associated with maximizing preferences. Those who believed that they personally had a higher-than-average risk of developing cancer were more likely to be maximizers (23.6% [59 of 250] vs 17.4% [131 of 751]; P = .03); this factor was not significant in regression analyses. Conclusions and Relevance In this survey study of US adults, those with medical maximizing tendencies more often overestimated the incidence of cancer and had higher levels of cancer-related worry. Targeted and personalized education about cancer and its risk factors may help reduce overutilization of oncologic care.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Netw Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Netw Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos