Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Midterm results after aortic valve neocuspidization.
Prinzing, Anatol; Boehm, Johannes; Burri, Melchior; Schreyer, Julia; Lange, Rüdiger; Krane, Markus.
Afiliação
  • Prinzing A; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute Insure, German Heart Center Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Boehm J; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute Insure, German Heart Center Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Burri M; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute Insure, German Heart Center Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Schreyer J; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute Insure, German Heart Center Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Lange R; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute Insure, German Heart Center Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Krane M; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute Insure, German Heart Center Munich, School of Medicine & Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
JTCVS Tech ; 25: 35-42, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38899113
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Aortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium is gaining increasing attention as a surgical treatment option for aortic valve disease. However, little is known about midterm durability and valve-related events.

Methods:

Patients undergoing aortic valve neocuspidization between 2016 and 2021 were included. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before the operation, at discharge, and annually thereafter. Data were analyzed for incidences of structural valve deterioration, bioprosthetic valve failure, survival, freedom from reoperation, and hemodynamic performance.

Results:

A total of 162 patients underwent aortic valve neocuspidization (mean age, 52.6 ± 16.6 years; range, 13-78 years); 114 (70.4%) were male. A total of 132 patients presented with a bicuspid aortic valve (81.5%) and 126 patients presented with aortic valve stenosis (77.8%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 63 patients (38.9%). Mean follow-up was 3.5 ± 1.2 years. At discharge, peak and mean pressure gradients were 15.6 ± 7.2 mm Hg and 8.4 ± 3.7 mm Hg, respectively, with a mean effective orifice area of 2.4 ± 0.8 cm2. After 5 years, peak and mean pressure gradients were 14.5 ± 4.6 mm Hg and 7.5 ± 2.2 mm Hg, respectively, with a mean effective orifice area of 2.3 ± 0.8 cm2. At 5 years, cumulative incidences of moderate and severe structural valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure were 9.82% ± 3.87%, 6.96% ± 3.71%, and 12.1% ± 4.12%, respectively. Survival was 97.3% ± 1.4%, and freedom from reoperation was 91.3% ± 2.4%.

Conclusions:

Aortic valve neocuspidization accomplishes low pressure gradients early after initial surgery and during follow-up. Survival in this young patient population is excellent. The main reason for reoperation is endocarditis, and rates for structural valve degeneration are low.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JTCVS Tech Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JTCVS Tech Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha