Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Health Economic Evaluation of Lung Cancer Screening Using a Diagnostic Blood Test: The Early Detection of Cancer of the Lung Scotland (ECLS).
Robles-Zurita, Jose Antonio; McMeekin, Nicola; Sullivan, Frank; Mair, Frances S; Briggs, Andrew.
Afiliação
  • Robles-Zurita JA; Department of Applied Economics (Statistics and Econometrics), University of Malaga, El Ejido nº 6, 29013 Malaga, Spain.
  • McMeekin N; Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TP, UK.
  • Sullivan F; Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TP, UK.
  • Mair FS; School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, UK.
  • Briggs A; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada.
Curr Oncol ; 31(6): 3546-3562, 2024 Jun 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38920744
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Diagnostic blood tests have the potential to identify lung cancer in people at high risk. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of a lung cancer screening intervention, using the EarlyCDT®-Lung Test (ECLS) with subsequent X-ray and low-dose chest CT scans (LDCT) for patients with a positive test result, compared to both usual care and LDCT screening for the target population.

METHODS:

We conducted a model-based lifetime analysis from a UK NHS and personal social services perspective. We estimated incremental net monetary benefit (NMB) for the ECLS intervention compared to no screening and to LDCT screening.

RESULTS:

The incremental NMB of ECLS intervention compared to no screening was GBP 33,179 (95% CI -GBP 81,396, GBP 147,180) and GBP 140,609 (95% CI -GBP 36,255, GBP 316,612), respectively, for a cost-effectiveness threshold of GBP 20,000 and GBP 30,000 per quality-adjusted life year. The same figures compared with LDCT screening were GBP 162,095 (95% CI GBP 52,698, GBP 271,735) and GBP 52,185 (95% CI -GBP 115,152, GBP 219,711).

CONCLUSIONS:

The ECLS intervention is the most cost-effective screening alternative, with the highest probability of being cost-effective, when compared to no screening or LDCT screening. This result may change with modifications of the parameters, suggesting that the three alternatives considered in the main analysis are potentially cost-effective.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Custo-Benefício / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Curr Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Custo-Benefício / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Curr Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha País de publicação: Suíça