Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of urothelial cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.
Ren, Jun-Wei; Chen, Ze-Yu; Bai, Yun-Jin; Han, Ping.
Afiliação
  • Ren JW; Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Chen ZY; Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Bai YJ; Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Han P; Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Front Pharmacol ; 15: 1377924, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38933670
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a refractory disease for which achieving satisfactory outcomes remains challenging with current surgical interventions. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a novel class of targeted therapeutics that have demonstrated encouraging results for UC. Although there is a limited number of high-quality randomized control trials (RCTs) examining the use of ADCs in patients with UC, some prospective non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs) provide valuable insights and pertinent information. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of ADCs in patients with UC, particularly those with locally advanced and metastatic diseases.

Methods:

A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to identify pertinent studies. Outcomes, such as the overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), were extracted for further analyses.

Results:

Twelve studies involving 1,311 patients were included in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor responses, the pooled ORR and DCR were 40% and 74%, respectively. Regarding survival analysis, the pooled median PFS and OS were 5.66 months and 12.63 months, respectively. The pooled 6-month PFS and OS were 47% and 80%, while the pooled 1-year PFS and OS were 22% and 55%, respectively. The most common TRAEs of the ADCs were alopecia (all grades 45%, grades ≥ III 0%), decreased appetite (all grades 34%, grades ≥ III 3%), dysgeusia (all grades 40%, grades ≥ III 0%), fatigue (all grades 39%, grades ≥ III 5%), nausea (all grades 45%, grades ≥ III 2%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (all grades 37%, grades ≥ III 2%), and pruritus (all grades 32%, grades ≥ III 1%).

Conclusion:

The meta-analysis in this study demonstrates that ADCs have promising efficacies and safety for patients with advanced or metastatic UC. Systematic review registration https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023460232.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China
...