Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Livestock turnover and dynamic livestock carrying capacity are crucial factors for alpine grassland management: The Qinghai-Tibetan plateau as a case study.
Ding, Lu-Ming; Yan, Qi; Liu, Pei-Pei; Yang, Qi-En; Henkin, Zalmen; Degen, Abraham Allan.
Afiliação
  • Ding LM; Sichuan Provincial Forest and Grassland Key Laboratory of Alpine Grassland Conservation and Utilization of Tibetan Plateau, Institute of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, College of Grassland Resources, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, 610041, China. Electronic address: dinglm@swun.edu.cn.
  • Yan Q; Center for the Pan-third Pole Environment, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
  • Liu PP; College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
  • Yang QE; Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, 810008, China.
  • Henkin Z; Department of Natural Resources, Newe-Ya'ar Research Center, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Institute, Israel.
  • Degen AA; Desert Animal Adaptations and Husbandry, Wyler Department of Dryland Agriculture, Blaustein for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
J Environ Manage ; 365: 121586, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38941853
ABSTRACT
Alpine grasslands are distributed widely on high-elevated ranges and plateaus from the wet tropics to polar regions, accounting for approximately 3% of the world's land area. The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP) is the highest and largest plateau in the world, and approximately 60% of the plateau consists of alpine grassland, which is used mainly for grazing animals. Livestock structure was determined in Guinan (GN), Yushu (YS) and Maqu counties (MQ) on the QTP by interviewing 235 local pastoralists. Based on data collected from GN, the livestock carrying capacity was calculated using herbage dry matter biomass intake (LCCm) by the livestock, and the metabolizable energy yield (LCCe) and digestible crude protein (LCCp) available in pasture. The pasture area per household differed among the regions of the QTP, which was the main reason for the difference in livestock stocking rate. The householders raised the appropriate proportion of breeding females and young yaks and sheep in GN and MQ, but not in YS, to maintain a constant turnover. Most pasture in YS was used at the community level, especially in summer. The calculated carrying capacities based on metabolizable energy yield (LCCe) of the pasture and dry matter biomass (LCCm) were similar in most months except for August, when the value of LCCe was higher than LCCm. Based on the digestible protein of the pasture, the calculated livestock carrying capacity overestimated the actual carrying capacity during the herbage growing season from May to September. Appropriate practices should be taken in different regions of QTP, such as providing supplementary feed, especially protein, during the forage non-growing season. Livestock carrying capacity should be adjusted dynamically, and calculated by a number of parameters. The stocking rate should be controlled to optimize livestock production and curb or minimize grassland degradation to generate a sustainable system. This study examined the grasslands and LCC on the QTP, but the results could be applied to grasslands worldwide.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pradaria / Gado Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Manage Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pradaria / Gado Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Manage Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article