General practitioners' perspectives on diagnostic testing in children with persistent non-specific symptoms.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic testing is prevalent among children with persistent non-specific symptoms (PNS), and both undertesting and overtesting have negative consequences for child and society. Research in adults with PNS has shown that general practitioners (GPs) use diagnostic testing for reasons other than diagnosis, but comparable research has not been conducted in children. Understanding GPs' perspectives of testing decisions in children could provide insights into mechanisms of undertesting and overtesting. AIM: To investigate GPs' perspectives of conducting or refraining from diagnostic testing in children with PNS, and differences with motives in adults. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with Dutch GPs. METHOD: We purposively sampled GPs until data saturation. Reasons for conducting or refraining from diagnostic tests were explored using two real-life cases from daily practice. Online video interviews were transcribed verbatim. Data were collected and analyzed concurrently by thematic content analysis. FINDINGS: Twelve GPs participated. Their decision-making involved a complex trade-off among four themes medical (e.g., alarm symptoms), psychosocial (e.g., doctor-patient relationship), consultation management (e.g., 'quick fix'), and efficient resource utilization (e.g., sustainability). Compared to adults, GPs were more hesitant to conduct diagnostic testing in children due to their higher vulnerability to fearing invasive procedures, lower probability of organic disease, and reduced autonomy. CONCLUSION: As in adults, GPs' decisions to conduct diagnostic tests in children were motivated by reasons beyond diagnostic uncertainty. Educational programs, interventions, and guidelines that aim to change the testing behaviors of GPs in children with PNS should target these reasons as well.