Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing focal spot alignment in clinical linear accelerators: a comprehensive evaluation with triplet phantoms.
Riis, Hans L; Engstrøm, Kenni H; Slama, Luke; Dass, Joshua; Ebert, Martin A; Rowshanfarzad, Pejman.
Afiliação
  • Riis HL; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. hans.lynggaard.riis@rsyd.dk.
  • Engstrøm KH; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. hans.lynggaard.riis@rsyd.dk.
  • Slama L; Radiofysisk Laboratorium, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, DK-5000 Odense C, Odense, Denmark. hans.lynggaard.riis@rsyd.dk.
  • Dass J; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Ebert MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.
  • Rowshanfarzad P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.
Phys Eng Sci Med ; 2024 Jul 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38954381
ABSTRACT
A fundamental parameter to evaluate the beam delivery precision and stability on a clinical linear accelerator (linac) is the focal spot position (FSP) measured relative to the collimator axis of the radiation head. The aims of this work were to evaluate comprehensive data on FSP acquired on linacs in clinical use and to establish the ability of alternative phantoms to detect effects on patient plan delivery related to FSP. FSP measurements were conducted using a rigid phantom holding two ball-bearings at two different distances from the radiation source. Images of these ball-bearings were acquired using the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) integrated with each linac. Machine QA was assessed using a radiation head-mounted PTW STARCHECK phantom. Patient plan QA was investigated using the SNC ArcCHECK phantom positioned on the treatment couch, irradiated with VMAT plans across a complete 360° gantry rotation and three X-ray energies. This study covered eight Elekta linacs, including those with 6 MV, 18 MV, and 6 MV flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams. The largest range in the FSP was found for 6 MV FFF. The FSP of one linac, retrofitted with 6 MV FFF, displayed substantial differences in FSP compared to 6 MV FFF beams on other linacs, which all had FSP ranges less than 0.50 mm and 0.25 mm in the lateral and longitudinal directions, respectively. The PTW STARCHECK phantom proved effective in characterising the FSP, while the SNC ArcCHECK measurements could not discern FSP-related features. Minor variations in FSP may be attributed to adjustments in linac parameters, component replacements necessary for beam delivery, and the wear and tear of various linac components, including the magnetron and gun filament. Consideration should be given to the ability of any particular phantom to detect a subsequent impact on the accuracy of patient plan delivery.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Phys Eng Sci Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Phys Eng Sci Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca