Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic and prognostic performance of CNSide™ versus standard cytology for leptomeningeal disease.
Appel, Haley R; Rubens, Muni; Roy, Mukesh; Kotecha, Rupesh; Hall, Matthew D; Mehta, Minesh P; Mohler, Alexander; Chen, Zhijian; Ahluwalia, Manmeet S; Odia, Yazmin.
Afiliação
  • Appel HR; Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Rubens M; Department of Clinical Informatics, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Roy M; Department of Clinical Informatics, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Kotecha R; Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Hall MD; Department of Translational Medicine, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Mehta MP; Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Mohler A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Chen Z; Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Ahluwalia MS; Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Odia Y; Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Neurooncol Adv ; 6(1): vdae071, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957163
ABSTRACT

Background:

This retrospective study compares the real-world performance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) CNSide™ versus cytology in leptomeningeal disease (LMD).

Methods:

Consecutive patients with suspected LMD who underwent lumbar punctures for CSF cytology and CNSide™ from January 2020 to December 2022 were reviewed. LMD was classified by EANO criteria. Descriptive statistics, confusion matrix, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional regression were used.

Results:

Median age for 87 evaluable patients was 63 years (range 23-93); 82 (94%) met EANO criteria for possible/probable/confirmed LMD (EANO/LMD). The commonest primary cancers were breast (36,44.0%) and lung (34,41.5%). Primary lung harbored actionable mutations in 18 (53.0%); primary breast expressed hormone receptors in 27 (75%), and HER2 amplification in 8 (22%). Uncontrolled systemic disease was detected in 35 (40%), while 25 (46%) received systemic therapy with medium/high CNS penetrance at LMD diagnosis. The median time from initial cancer to LMD diagnosis was 31 months (range 13-73). LMD was confirmed by CSF cytology in 23/82 (28%), all identified by CNSide™. CNSide™ identified 13 additional cases (36/82, 43.9%), increasing diagnostic yield by 56.5%. Median overall survival (mOS) was 31 weeks (95%CI 21-43), significantly worse for CNSide™ positive versus negative 4.0 versus 16.0 weeks, respectively (HR = 0.50, P = .010). While survival since LMD diagnosis did not differ by histology, time to LMD diagnosis from initial cancer diagnosis was longer for breast (48.5 months, IQR 30.0-87.5) versus lung (8 months, IQR0.5-16.0) cohorts. mOS was longer for patients eligible for intrathecal chemotherapy (HR 0.189, 95%CI 0.053-0.672, P = .010).

Conclusions:

This retrospective, real-world analysis of CNSide™ showed increased sensitivity versus cytology and provided clinically relevant molecular CSF analyses.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Neurooncol Adv Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Neurooncol Adv Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...