Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sex differences in chest electrical impedance tomography findings.
Frerichs, I; Händel, C; Becher, T; Schädler, D.
Afiliação
  • Frerichs I; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
  • Händel C; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
  • Becher T; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
  • Schädler D; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Physiol Meas ; 45(7)2024 Jul 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959902
ABSTRACT
Objective.Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has been used to determine regional lung ventilation distribution in humans for decades, however, the effect of biological sex on the findings has hardly ever been examined. The aim of our study was to determine if the spatial distribution of ventilation assessed by EIT during quiet breathing was influenced by biological sex.Approach.219 adults with no known acute or chronic lung disease were examined in sitting position with the EIT electrodes placed around the lower chest (6th intercostal space). EIT data were recorded at 33 images/s during quiet breathing for 60 s. Regional tidal impedance variation was calculated in all EIT image pixels and the spatial distribution of the values was determined using the established EIT measures of centre of ventilation in ventrodorsal (CoVvd) and right-to-left direction (CoVrl), the dorsal and right fraction of ventilation, and ventilation defect score.Main results.After exclusion of one subject due to insufficient electrode contact, 218 data sets were analysed (120 men, 98 women) (age 53 ± 18 vs 50 ± 16 yr (p= 0.2607), body mass index 26.4 ± 4.0 vs 26.4 ± 6.6 kg m-2(p= 0.9158), mean ± SD). Highly significant differences in ventilation distribution were identified between men and women between the right and left chest sides (CoVrl 47.0 ± 2.9 vs 48.8 ± 3.3% of chest diameter (p< 0.0001), right fraction of ventilation 0.573 ± 0.067 vs 0.539 ± 0.071 (p= 0.0004)) and less significant in the ventrodorsal direction (CoVvd 55.6 ± 4.2 vs 54.5 ± 3.6% of chest diameter (p= 0.0364), dorsal fraction of ventilation 0.650 ± 0.121 vs 0.625 ± 0.104 (p= 0.1155)). Ventilation defect score higher than one was found in 42.5% of men but only in 16.6% of women.Significance.Biological sex needs to be considered when EIT findings acquired in upright subjects in a rather caudal examination plane are interpreted. Sex differences in chest anatomy and thoracoabdominal mechanics may explain the results.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tórax / Tomografia / Caracteres Sexuais / Impedância Elétrica Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Physiol Meas Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA / ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tórax / Tomografia / Caracteres Sexuais / Impedância Elétrica Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Physiol Meas Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA / ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha