Performance of a gelling fibre dressing in management of wounds in a community setting: a sub-analysis of the VIPES study.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use and performance of a gelling fibre dressing (Biatain Fiber; Coloplast A/S, Denmark) in the management of wounds in community nursing practice. METHOD: A sub-analysis of the prospective, observational, real-world VIPES (Observatoire en Ville des Plaies ExSudatives) study was conducted. Patients with exuding wounds, for which nurses chose to apply the gelling fibre as a primary dressing, were included. Outcomes included assessments of wound condition and patient/nurse opinion. RESULTS: Overall, 149 patients with acute (n=52; 34.9%) or hard-to-heal (chronic) (n=97; 65.1%) wounds were included. At baseline, mean±standard deviation wound age was 351.5±998.2 days, 108 (72.5%) wounds were moderately-to-highly exuding, and 126 (84.6%) showed exudate pooling in the wound bed. At the last follow-up visit, 29 (19.5%) wounds had healed, within a median of 36 days, and 64 (43.0%) were progressing towards healing. From baseline to the last follow-up visit, significant reductions in wound surface area (p<0.05), depth (p<0.01), exudate level (p<0.0001), and in the proportion of wounds with sloughy tissue (p<0.0001) were observed. Most wounds had no (n=86; 58.5% (two missing values)) or low exudate pooling (n=45; 30.6% (two missing values)) at the last visit and proportions of patients with healthy wound edges/periwound skin increased from baseline. At the last visit, wounds were considered improved by nurses in 71.4% (n=105) of cases, and by patients in 66.7% (n=98) of cases (two patients missing). CONCLUSION: Patients who received treatment with the gelling fibre experienced improvements in the condition of a range of complex wounds. This analysis highlights the importance of adequate exudate management, and indicates how the selection of an appropriate wound dressing can encourage healing progression. DECLARATION OF INTEREST This study was financially supported by Laboratoires Coloplast SAS, Paris, France. Coloplast A/S funded the writing and editing of the article and contributed to its content. Coloplast A/S and Laboratoires Coloplast SAS reviewed the article for scientific accuracy. Nurses received financial compensation for their participation in the study. NA is a full-time employee of Coloplast A/S. APJ was an employee of Coloplast A/S when this article was written. FA was a full-time employee of Laboratoires Coloplast SAS at the time of publication development. RS and CJ are full-time employees of CEN Biotech. AK received an educational grant from Coloplast A/S to provide scientific input to the publication. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.