Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association Between Preoperative Cannabis Use and Increased Rate of Revision Surgery Following Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Chaliparambil, Rahul K; Mittal, Mehul; Gibson, William; Ahuja, Christopher; Dahdaleh, Nader S; El Tecle, Najib.
Afiliação
  • Chaliparambil RK; Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
  • Mittal M; Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
  • Gibson W; Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
  • Ahuja C; Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
  • Dahdaleh NS; Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
  • El Tecle N; Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Cureus ; 16(6): e61828, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38975423
ABSTRACT
The use of cannabis as a method of chronic pain relief has skyrocketed since its legalization in states across the United States. Clinicians currently have a limited scope regarding the effectiveness of marijuana on surgical procedures. This systematic review aims to determine the effect of current cannabis use on the rate of failure of spinal fusions and overall surgical outcomes. A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched, identifying studies assessing spinal fusion with reported preoperative cannabis use. Outcomes of interest included reoperation due to fusion failure or pseudoarthrosis with a follow-up time of at least six months. Subgroups of cervical fusions alone and lumbar fusions alone were also analyzed. Certainty in evidence and bias was assessed using the GRADE criteria and ROBINS-I tool (PROSPERO #CRD42023463548). Four studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 788 patients (188 in the cannabis user group and 600 in the non-user group). The rate of revision surgery among cannabis users was higher than that in non-users for all spinal fusions (RR 3.58, 95% CI 1.67 to 7.66, p = 0.001). For cervical fusions alone, there remained a higher rate of revision surgery for cannabis users compared to non-users (RR 4.47, 95% CI 1.93 to 10.36, p = 0.0005). For lumbar fusions alone, there was no difference in the rates of revision surgery between cannabis users and non-users (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.28 to 7.73, p = 0.79). Cannabis use was shown to be associated with a higher rate of pseudoarthrosis revisions in spinal fusions on meta-analysis. On subgroup stratification by spine region, cannabis use remained associated with pseudoarthrosis revisions on cervical fusions alone but not lumbar fusions alone. Further research with larger, randomized studies is required to fully elucidate the relationship between cannabis use and fusion, both in general and by spinal region.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos