Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Proactive advance care planning conversations in general practice: a quality improvement project.
Winnifrith, Tabitha; Millington-Sanders, Catherine; Husbands, Emma; Haros, Jane; Ballinger, Helen.
Afiliação
  • Winnifrith T; Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS FoundationTrust, Brockworth, UK tabitha.winnifrith@nhs.net.
  • Millington-Sanders C; RCGP, London, UK.
  • Husbands E; Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK.
  • Haros J; Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS FoundationTrust, Brockworth, UK.
  • Ballinger H; Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS FoundationTrust, Brockworth, UK.
BMJ Open Qual ; 13(3)2024 Jul 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38977313
ABSTRACT
Advance care planning (ACP) is a process of discussion, reflection and communication, enabling planning for future medical treatment. Despite evidence of benefits of ACP to patients, families and the healthcare system, many die without an opportunity for such conversations, particularly those living with progressive non-malignant conditions. The Royal College of General Practitioners and Marie Curie Daffodil Standards launched in 2020 provide primary care with a structure for improving end-of-life care, including delivery of ACP. Proactive identification of patients is integral to the approach.We report on a quality improvement project which aimed to assess the take-up rate and acceptability in general practice of a timely and personalised ACP conversation using a 'What matters to you' (WMTY) framework, and to ensure that different diagnostic and demographic groups were included.Patients without previous ACP and potentially in the last year of life were offered an ACP conversation; a survey sought feedback.81% accepted the offer and in most cases, future care guidance was documented using the recognised format in Gloucestershire for recording ACP conversations, the Recommended Summary for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) plan. Clinician and patient satisfaction was high.We concluded that an ACP discussion using a 'WMTY' format was highly acceptable to most. With recognised enablers in place and known barriers minimised, valuable personalised conversations occurred. Reframing the conversation to focus on how someone wants to live, while including their priorities for death, could alter how such conversations are perceived by clinicians and the public. It could remove negative associations (such as linking these conversations with an imminent death), which may increase motivation for all to initiate discussions.ACP conversations are evidenced best practice and could become routine in general practice with adjustments to practice processes and clinician education; the Daffodil Standards facilitate continued quality improvement.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comunicação / Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados / Medicina Geral / Melhoria de Qualidade Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Qual Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comunicação / Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados / Medicina Geral / Melhoria de Qualidade Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Qual Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido