Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of WAIC and posterior predictive approaches for N-mixture models.
Gaya, Heather E; Ketz, Alison C.
Afiliação
  • Gaya HE; Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. heather.e.gaya@gmail.com.
  • Ketz AC; Wisconsin Cooperative Research Unit, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 15743, 2024 Jul 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38977791
ABSTRACT
Hierarchical models are common for ecological analysis, but determining appropriate model selection methods remains an ongoing challenge. To confront this challenge, a suitable method is needed to evaluate and compare available candidate models. We compared performance of conditional WAIC, a joint-likelihood approach to WAIC (WAICj), and posterior-predictive loss for selecting between candidate N-mixture models. We tested these model selection criteria on simulated single-season N-mixture models, simulated multi-season N-mixture models with temporal auto-correlation, and three case studies of single-season N-mixture models based on eBird data. WAICj proved more accurate than the standard conditional formulation or posterior-predictive loss, even when models were temporally correlated, suggesting WAICj is a robust alternative to model selection for N-mixture models.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Modelos Estatísticos Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Modelos Estatísticos Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos