Different surface treatments on recently introduced CAD-CAM resin-modified ceramics: Implications on bond strength.

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The diverse chemical composition of recently introduced resin-modified ceramics complicates the establishment of a universally accepted clinical bonding protocol. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments of resin-modified ceramics on the bond strength to a resin cement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen 10×12×3-mm resin-modified ceramic slices were obtained from each material (Cerasmart; GC, Shofu Block HC; Shofu, Vita Enamic; Vita, Evolux hybrid; BlueDent, Alium; Alium). Slices were assigned to 4 groups based on surface treatments Control (no treatment), airborne-particle abrasion with Al2O3 (Al2O3), conditioning with 9% HF (HF), and Al2O3+HF. After treatments and silane coupling agent (Monobond N; Ivoclar) application, 7 resin cement cylinders (Choice 2 veneer; Bisco) were built on each slice and light polymerized for 20 seconds. Half of the specimens (n=14 cylinders) were stored for 24 hours, and the other half were thermocycled (20 000 cycles, 5 °C to 55 °C, 30-second dwell time). Microshear bond strength was tested and analyzed with 3-way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test (α=.05), and failure patterns were classified. Surface morphology after treatments was observed with scanning electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy. RESULTS: After 24 hours, all treatments induced higher bond strength (P<.05) than in the control in Evolux. Al2O3+HF caused higher bond strength (P<.05) than in the control in Cerasmart and Shofu, and higher bond strength than Al2O3 in Cerasmart. However, it resulted in lower bond strength (P<.05) than Al2O3 in Alium. After thermocycling, irrespective of the resin-modified ceramic, all treatments induced higher bond strength (P<.05) than in the control. HF induced lower bond strength (P<.05) than Al2O3 in Alium. Al2O3+HF caused the highest bond strength (P<.05) in Evolux and higher bond strength (P<.05) than HF in Vita Enamic. Adhesive failures were prevalent under control conditions, and mixed failures were common after treatments. Al2O3 induced surface alterations in all resin-modified ceramics. HF notably altered Vita Enamic, while it had no noticeable impact on the other resin-modified ceramics. Al2O3+HF caused a considerable alteration in Vita Enamic and modified the other resin-modified ceramics. Vita Enamic had the characteristic vibrational bands of inorganic compounds, while the other resin-modified ceramics exhibited distinct bands associated with organic compounds. CONCLUSIONS: Airborne-particle abrasion with Al2O3 followed by HF yielded the highest bond strength, regardless of the resin-modified ceramic, except for Alium, which demonstrated better bond strength after airborne-particle abrasion with Al2O3. 9% HF for 30 seconds caused notable surface alterations in Vita Enamic, negatively impacting its bond strength. Vita Enamic was the only resin-modified ceramic displaying both organic and inorganic composition, while the other resin-modified ceramics showed predominantly organic composition.