Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of nursing intervention on rehabilitation of patients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps after nasal endoscopy.
Xu, Hui; Pan, Miao; Zhu, Lin.
Afiliação
  • Xu H; Department of Otolaryngology, The First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District, Wuhan 430200, Hubei Province, China.
  • Pan M; Department of Otolaryngology, The First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District, Wuhan 430200, Hubei Province, China.
  • Zhu L; Department of Otolaryngology, The First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District, Wuhan 430200, Hubei Province, China. a159sunny@126.com.
World J Clin Cases ; 12(19): 3785-3790, 2024 Jul 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38994292
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Chronic sinusitis is a kind of chronic suppurative inflammation of the sinus mucosa. Nasal endoscopy is a good method to treat nasal polyps. However postoperative rehabilitation and care should not be neglected.

AIM:

To investigate the Effect of nursing intervention on the rehabilitation of patients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps (CSNPS) after nasal endoscopy.

METHODS:

A total of 129 patients with CSNPS hospitalized from February 2017 to February 2019 were studied. Using the digital parity method, we investigated nursing cooperation strategies for endoscopic surgery. The comparison group (64 cases) Surgical nursing was carried out with traditional nursing measures; experimental group (65 cases) Surgical nursing was carried out by traditional nursing countermeasures + comprehensive nursing measures. We compared postoperative recovery rates, nursing satisfaction rates, and nasal cavity ratings between the two groups.

RESULTS:

Experimental group patients with CSNPS had a significantly higher recovery rate (98.46%) compared to the control group (79.69%). This difference was statistically significant (χ 2 = 11.748, P < 0.05). Additionally, the satisfaction rate with treatment was also significantly higher in the experimental group (98.46%) compared to the control group (79.69%), with a statistically significant difference (χ 2 = 11.748, P < 0.05). Before nursing, there was no significant difference in sinus nasal cavity scores between the experimental group (20.29 ± 7.25 points) and the control group (20.30 ± 7.27 points) (t = 0.008, P > 0.05). However, after nursing, the sinus nasal cavity score in the experimental group (8.85 ± 3.22 points) was significantly lower than that in the control group (14.99 ± 5.02 points) (t = 8.282, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Comprehensive nursing intervention in patients with CSNPS can significantly improve the total recovery rate after endoscopic surgery.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: World J Clin Cases Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: World J Clin Cases Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Estados Unidos