Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does aortic calcification really affect anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery?
Diao, Yu-Hang; Chen, Jian; Liu, Yang; Peng, Dong; Yang, Dong.
Afiliação
  • Diao YH; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Chen J; Department of Radiology, Qijiang People's Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Liu Y; Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Peng D; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Yang D; Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(28): e38860, 2024 Jul 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38996164
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the current study was to analyze whether aortic calcification had impact on the anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer (RC) surgery. We collected patients' information from January 2011 to January 2020 in a single teaching hospital. Preoperative computed tomography images were obtained. Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC), superior mesenteric aortic calcification, and inferior mesenteric aortic calcification were recorded. The difference of AL and grade C AL was calculated. A total of 2412 RC patients were included in this study. Ninety-seven (4.0%) RC patients experienced AL and 47 (1.9%) RC patients experienced grade C AL. The amount of AAC, superior mesenteric aortic calcification, and inferior mesenteric aortic calcification was 1546 (64.1%), 128 (5.3%), and 31 (1.3%). The AL group had higher portion of AAC (P = .019) than the no AL group, and the grade C AL group had higher portion of AAC (P = .016) than the no grade C AL group. In univariate logistic regression analysis, AAC was a significant potential factor for AL (P = .021, OR = 1.739, 95% CI = 1.088-2.779) and grade C AL (P = .019, OR = 2.339, 95% CI = 1.115-4.986). However, in multivariate logistic regression, AAC was not an independent predictive factor for AL (P = .157, OR = 1.443, 95% CI = 0.871-2.358) or grade C AL (P = .064, OR = 2.055, 95% CI = 0.960-4.399). AAC was associated with higher amount of AL and grade C AL, however, AAC was not an independent predictive factor for AL or grade C AL.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Fístula Anastomótica / Calcificação Vascular Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Medicine (Baltimore) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Fístula Anastomótica / Calcificação Vascular Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Medicine (Baltimore) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Estados Unidos