Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Navigating the Aftermath: A Comprehensive Scoping Review on Follow-up Strategies After Kidney-sparing Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.
Schuil, Hugo W; Figaroa, Orlane J A; Hendriks, Nora; Schout, Barbara M A; Beerlage, Harrie P; van Jamaludin, Faridi S; M E L Henderickx, Michaël; van Moorselaar, R Jeroen A; Kamphuis, Guido M; Baard, Joyce.
Afiliação
  • Schuil HW; Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Figaroa OJA; Department of Urology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
  • Hendriks N; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Schout BMA; Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Beerlage HP; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Jamaludin FS; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • M E L Henderickx M; Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Moorselaar RJA; Department of Urology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
  • Kamphuis GM; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Baard J; Department of Urology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
Eur Urol Open Sci ; 66: 82-92, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39050911
ABSTRACT
Background and

objective:

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) can be managed efficiently and safely through kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) in selected patient groups. However, the most effective and efficient postoperative surveillance strategy remains undetermined. We aimed to provide a comprehensive synopsis of the follow-up strategies and survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with UTUC treated by KSS.

Methods:

Following the systematic methodology outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews, we conducted searches in four databases (MEDLINE [Ovid], Embase [Ovid], Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) up until December 11, 2023. Key findings and

limitations:

A total of 3121 articles underwent screening, of which 19 were selected for inclusion in this review. The follow-up schedules after KSS exhibited considerable variability among the included studies. Diagnostic modalities employed consisted of computed tomography urography (present in 84% of protocols), X urography (21%), ultrasound (21%), thoracic imaging (26%), voided urine cytology (89%), selective upper tract cytology (5.3%), cystoscopy (84%), and ureterorenoscopy (53%) at varying frequencies. At 5 yr of follow-up, the reported recurrence-free survival rate ranged from 30% to 86%, overall survival was 50-92%, and metastasis-free survival was 77-90%. Conclusions and clinical implications This review unveils significant heterogeneity in clinical practices and survival outcomes, indicating disparities between real-world approaches and guideline recommendations. The lack of consensus on follow-up schemes is evident, emphasising the necessity for future initiatives aimed at developing a comprehensive protocol. Patient

summary:

This review shows significant heterogeneity in follow-up strategies after kidney-sparing surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. A lack of evidence contributes to discrepancies between guidelines and real-world approaches. Thus, future endeavours should aim at establishing a comprehensive protocol.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Open Sci Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Open Sci Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Holanda