Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of patient habitus and acquisition protocol on iodine quantification in dual-source photon-counting computed tomography.
Liu, Leening P; Pua, Rizza; Dieckmeyer, Michael; Shapira, Nadav; Sahbaee, Pooyan; Gang, Grace J; Litt, Harold I; Noël, Peter B.
Afiliação
  • Liu LP; University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Pua R; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Bioengineering, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Dieckmeyer M; University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Shapira N; University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Sahbaee P; Technical University of Munich, Department of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
  • Gang GJ; University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Litt HI; Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Noël PB; University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham) ; 11(Suppl 1): S12806, 2024 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39072220
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Evaluation of iodine quantification accuracy with varying iterative reconstruction level, patient habitus, and acquisition mode on a first-generation dual-source photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) system.

Approach:

A multi-energy CT phantom with and without its extension ring equipped with various iodine inserts (0.2 to 15.0 mg/ml) was scanned over a range of radiation dose levels ( CTDI vol 0.5 to 15.0 mGy) using two tube voltages (120, 140 kVp) and two different source modes (single-, dual-source). To assess the agreement between nominal and measured iodine concentrations, iodine density maps at different iterative reconstruction levels were utilized to calculate root mean square error (RMSE) and generate Bland-Altman plots by grouping radiation dose levels (ultra-low < 1.5 ; low 1.5 to 5; medium 5 to 15 mGy) and iodine concentrations (low < 5 ; high 5 to 15 mg/mL).

Results:

Overall, quantification of iodine concentrations was accurate and reliable even at ultra-low radiation dose levels. RMSE ranged from 0.25 to 0.37, 0.20 to 0.38, and 0.25 to 0.37 mg/ml for ultra-low, low, and medium radiation dose levels, respectively. Similarly, RMSE was stable at 0.31, 0.28, 0.33, and 0.30 mg/ml for tube voltage and source mode combinations. Ultimately, the accuracy of iodine quantification was higher for the phantom without an extension ring (RMSE 0.21 mg/mL) and did not vary across different levels of iterative reconstruction.

Conclusions:

The first-generation PCCT allows for accurate iodine quantification over a wide range of iodine concentrations and radiation dose levels. Stable accuracy across iterative reconstruction levels may allow further radiation exposure reductions without affecting quantitative results.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos