Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Care quality and safety in long-term aged care settings: A systematic review and narrative analysis of missed care measurements.
Wang, Xinxia; Rihari-Thomas, John; Bail, Kasia; Bala, Nina; Traynor, Victoria.
Afiliação
  • Wang X; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
  • Rihari-Thomas J; Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Bail K; Centre for Ageing Research and Translation, University of Canberra and Synergy Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre ACT Health Directorate, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
  • Bala N; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
  • Traynor V; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
J Adv Nurs ; 2024 Aug 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39092879
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To critically evaluate missed care measurement approaches and their application in long-term aged care (LTAC) settings.

DESIGN:

Systematic review using Tawfik's guideline. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and ProQuest were searched. Supplemental searching was from reference lists of retrieved records, first authors' ORCID homepages and Google advanced search for grey literature. Search limitations were English language, published between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2022. REVIEW

METHOD:

COVIDENCE was utilized for screening, data extraction and quality appraisal. JBI Critical Appraisal Tools and COSMIN Risk of Bias Tool were used for quality appraisal. Data were summarized and synthesized using narrative analysis.

RESULTS:

Twenty-four publications across 11 regions were included, with two principal methods of missed care measurement modified standard scales and tailored specific approaches. They were applied inconsistently and generated diverse measurement outcomes. There were challenges even with the most commonly used tool, the BERNCA-NH, including absence of high-quality verification through comparative analysis against an established 'gold standard', reliance on self-administration, incomplete assessment of constructs and inadequate exploration of psychometric properties.

CONCLUSION:

Globally, there are deficiencies in the effectiveness and comprehensiveness of the instruments measuring missed care in LTAC settings. Further research on theoretical and practical perspectives is required. IMPLICATIONS Findings highlighted a critical need to establish a standardized, validated approach to measure missed care in LTAC settings. This review calls for collaborative efforts by researchers, clinical staff and policymakers to develop and implement evidence-based practices as a way of safeguarding the well-being of older clients living in LTAC settings. IMPACT Measurements of missed care in LTAC settings rely on adapting acute care tools. There is a critical gap in measuring missed care in LTAC settings. Developing a new tool could improve care quality and safety in LTAC settings globally. REPORTING

METHOD:

Adhered to PRISMA guideline. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION No patient or public contribution.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Adv Nurs Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Adv Nurs Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália