Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inhibition moderates the effect of attentional bias modification for reducing residual depressive symptoms: A randomized sham-controlled clinical trial.
Bø, Ragnhild; Kraft, Brage; Skilbrei, August; Jonassen, Rune; Harmer, Catherine J; Landrø, Nils Inge.
Afiliação
  • Bø R; Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: ragnhild.bo@psykologi.uio.no.
  • Kraft B; Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway; Division of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Norway; Department of Behavioural Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway.
  • Skilbrei A; Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway.
  • Jonassen R; Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway.
  • Harmer CJ; Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Psychiatry, Oxford University, United Kingdom; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom.
  • Landrø NI; Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway; Division of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Norway.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry ; 85: 101982, 2024 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39111231
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Residual symptoms represent risk factor for relapse. Attention bias modification (ABM) may reduce clinical and sub-clinical depressive symptoms, indicating that is may be of relevance when preventing relapse. Current evidence suggests that executive functions may moderate the outcome of interventions targeting depressive symptoms.

METHODS:

We assessed inhibition and shifting as indicators of executive functioning by means of the Color-Word Interference Test (i.e., "Stroop task"). These baseline characteristics were investigated as moderator of the effect of ABM on depression symptoms in a double-blinded randomized sham-controlled trial of ABM including patients with a history of recurrent depression (N = 301). Inclusion and follow-ups took place from January 2015 to October 2016. The trial was retrospectively registered #NCT02658682 January 2016.

RESULTS:

The moderation analysis was based on the interaction term ABM x Stroop. Scaled inhibition scores ≤10.8, but not shifting ability, moderated the effect of ABM compared to sham on clinician-rated depression (HDRS). The difference from the 15th to the 85th percentile of the inhibition score was about 1 HDRS-point, indicating a small effect size. No moderation was found when self-reported depression and AB were the outcome. Post-hoc power calculation indicates risk of Type-II error.

CONCLUSION:

When targeting depressive symptoms, ABM seems to be somewhat more effective in patients with weak inhibitory control. This suggests that evaluating the level of inhibition in individual patients could provide some information when making decisions about prescribing ABM to reduce residual symptoms, but the clinical implications of this is uncertain due to an overall small effect size attributable to ABM. Future studies should examine whether inhibitory control still is a relevant moderator when comparing ABM to treatment options other than the sham control condition.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Depressão / Função Executiva / Viés de Atenção / Inibição Psicológica Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Depressão / Função Executiva / Viés de Atenção / Inibição Psicológica Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Holanda