Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted surgical approach in median arcuate ligament syndrome-a systematic review.
Gunjiganvi, Mallikarjun; Marthandam, Srikanth; Murugesan, Rajeswari; Palaniappan, Raj.
Afiliação
  • Gunjiganvi M; Department of Surgery, AIIMS Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India. gunjiganvi@gmail.com.
  • Marthandam S; Department of Surgery, AIIMS Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Murugesan R; Department of Biostatistics, AIIMS Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Palaniappan R; Department of Bariatrics and Metabolic Surgery, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 318, 2024 Aug 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39122880
ABSTRACT
Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is rare syndrome and is diagnosis of exclusion. Though first robotic median arcuate ligament release (MALR) was described in 2007, there are only a few case reports (CR), case series (CS), and retrospective cohort studies (RCS) in the published literature. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted MALR (r-MALR). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched (last search December 2023) for articles reporting r-MALR. All studies including CR, CS, RCS reporting technical feasibility (operating time and rate of conversions), safety (intra-operative complications, blood loss, post-operative complications), and outcome (length of stay [LoS]) were included (PROSPERO CRD42024502792). A total of 23 studies (8-CR, 5-CS, 10-RCS) with total 290 patients were available in the literature. Except 1-RCS, all studies reported age and mean age for CR was 40.38 ± 17.7, 36.08 ± 15.12 for CS, 39.72 ± 7.35 years for RS; except 2-RCS, all studies reported gender distribution and there were 57 males and 214 females. Operating time 3-CR, 4-CS, 9-RCS reported operating time, and mean time was 111 ± 54, 131.69 ± 7.51, 117.34 ± 35.03 min, respectively. Conversion rate All studies reported data on conversion and only four (1.37%) cases were converted-one to laparoscopic approach, three to open approach (1-inadvertent celiac arteriotomy, 2-reasons not mentioned). Intraoperative complications only 5-CR, 4-CS, and 9-RCS reported data on intra-operative complications, and there were only 6 complications (1.5%) 1-inadvertent celiac arteriotomy converted to open; 3-unnamed vascular injuries (2 managed robotically, 1 converted to open); 1-bleeding managed robotically; there were no other reported injuries. Estimated blood loss ranged from 5 to 30 ml. Post-operative complications 5-CR, 4-CS, 8-RCS described post-operative complications in 21 (7%) patients. Twenty cases were grade I, one was grade IIIa, and all managed successfully. LoS stay 2-CR, 4-CS, 10-RCS reported LoS and overall, it was 2 days. r-MALR is reasonable, technically feasible, safe, and has acceptable outcomes. In addition, robotic approach provided superior vision, improved dexterity, precise, and easy circumferential dissection.PROSPERO registration The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024502792).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Estudos de Viabilidade / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Síndrome do Ligamento Arqueado Mediano Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Robot Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Estudos de Viabilidade / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Síndrome do Ligamento Arqueado Mediano Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Robot Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia País de publicação: Reino Unido