Frailty as a trigger for goals-of-care discussions in rapid response calls: A single-centre retrospective cohort study.
Aust Crit Care
; 2024 Aug 09.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-39127605
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Timely goals-of-care (GOC) discussions are essential for end-of-life planning, particularly during acute hospital admissions, where ambiguity often persists. Frailty, prevalent in the ageing population and linked to adverse outcomes, underscores the need to align treatment strategies with quality of life. Recognising frailty as a trigger for GOC discussions during rapid response calls (RRCs) is critical for efficient resource management and improving patient outcomes.METHODS:
This single-centre retrospective cohort study included all hospitalised patients aged ≥65 years admitted between September 2021 and June 2023 who experienced an RRC. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) during the RRC. The primary outcome was to investigate whether frailty, specifically assessed by the CFS as screened during an RRC, could be a suitable clinical trigger for initiating GOC discussions. We also aimed to identify the proportion of patients with frailty (CFS score ≥5) and predictors at the time of RRC, resulting in recommendations for GOC discussions.RESULTS:
Among 4954 patients, 1685 (34.0%) were classified as frail (CFS score ≥5). Recommendations increased with frailty levels (nonfrail [CFS score 1-4] 6.6%, mildly frail [CFS score 5] 19.3%, moderate-to-severely frail [CFS score 6-9] 32.2%; p < 0.001). Frailty independently increased the probability of GOC recommendations during an RRC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.71). The CFS cut-off point for GOC recommendations was ≥5. The presence of frailty was associated with higher odds of receiving GOC recommendations for mildly frail (CFS score 5; odds ratio [OR] = 2.53; 95% confidence interval 1.96-3.27) and moderate-to-severely frail (CFS score 6-9; OR = 4.69; 95% confidence interval 3.81-5.78) compared to nonfrail patients.CONCLUSION:
Frailty, identified during an RRC, served as a robust trigger for GOC recommendations, highlighting the importance of tailored proactive discussions before episodes of deterioration. Higher levels of frailty (CFS score ≥5) demonstrate practical markers for aiding clinicians with proactive GOC discussions.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Aust Crit Care
Assunto da revista:
ENFERMAGEM
/
TERAPIA INTENSIVA
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de publicação:
Austrália