Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Regional Differences in Stage III Nonseminoma Germ Cell Tumor Patients Across SEER Registries.
Cano Garcia, Cristina; Barletta, Francesco; Tappero, Stefano; Piccinelli, Mattia Luca; Incesu, Reha-Baris; Morra, Simone; Scheipner, Lukas; Tian, Zhe; Saad, Fred; Shariat, Shahrokh F; Ahyai, Sascha; Longo, Nicola; Tilki, Derya; De Cobelli, Ottavio; Terrone, Carlo; Briganti, Alberto; Banek, Severine; Kluth, Luis A; Chun, Felix K H; Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Afiliação
  • Cano Garcia C; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Goethe University Frankfurt, Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. Electronic address: cristina.cano.garcia.ukf@gmail.com.
  • Barletta F; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University,
  • Tappero S; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Piccinelli ML; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Incesu RB; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Morra S; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Scheipner L; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Tian Z; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Saad F; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Shariat SF; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman
  • Ahyai S; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Longo N; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Tilki D; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • De Cobelli O; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Terrone C; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
  • Briganti A; Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
  • Banek S; Goethe University Frankfurt, Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Kluth LA; Goethe University Frankfurt, Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Chun FKH; Goethe University Frankfurt, Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Karakiewicz PI; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(5): 102161, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39147612
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We investigated regional differences in patients with stage III nonseminoma germ cell tumor (NSGCT). Specifically, we investigated differences in baseline patient, tumor characteristics and treatment characteristics, as well as cancer-specific mortality (CSM) across different regions of the United States.

METHODS:

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2018), patient (age, race/ethnicity), tumor (International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group [IGCCCG] prognostic groups) and treatment (systemic therapy and retroperitoneal lymph dissection [RPLND] status) characteristics were tabulated for stage III NSGCT patients, according to 12 SEER registries representing different geographic regions. Multinomial regression models and multivariable Cox regression models testing for cancer-specific mortality (CSM) were used.

RESULTS:

In 3,174 stage III NSGCT patients, registry-specific patient counts ranged from 51 (1.5%) to 1630 (51.3%). Differences across registries existed for age (12%-31% for age 40+), race/ethnicity (5%-73% for others than non-Hispanic whites), IGCCCG prognostic groups (24%-43% vs. 14-24% vs. 3%-20%, in respectively poor vs. intermediate vs. good prognosis), systemic therapy (87%-96%) and RPLND status (12%-35%). After adjustment, clinically meaningful inter-registry differences remained for systemic therapy (84%-97%) and RPLND (11%-32%). Unadjusted 5-year CSM rates ranged from 7.1% to 23.3%. Finally in multivariable analyses addressing CSM, 2 registries exhibited more favorable outcomes than SEER registry of reference (SEER Registry 12) SEER Registry 4 (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.36) and SEER Registry 9 (HR 0.64; both P = .004).

CONCLUSION:

We identified important regional differences in patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, as well as CSM which may be indicative of regional differences in quality of care or expertise in stage III NGSCT management.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Testiculares / Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas / Programa de SEER / Estadiamento de Neoplasias Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Genitourin Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Testiculares / Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas / Programa de SEER / Estadiamento de Neoplasias Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Genitourin Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos