Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring Structures and Processes supporting Interprofessional Education during Experiential Learning Placements for Student Pharmacists.
Depasquale, Clare; Arnold, Amy; Cunningham, Prof Scott; Jacob, Sabrina Anne; Boyter, Anne; Portlock, Prof Jane; Power, Ailsa; Addison, Brian.
Afiliação
  • Depasquale C; School of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Rd, Aberdeen AB10 7GJ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: c.depasquale@rgu.ac.uk.
  • Arnold A; School of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom. Electronic address: a.arnold1@rgu.ac.uk.
  • Cunningham PS; School of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom. Electronic address: s.cunningham@rgu.ac.uk.
  • Jacob SA; Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom. Electronic address: sabrina.jacob@strath.ac.uk.
  • Boyter A; Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom. Electronic address: anne.boyter@strath.ac.uk.
  • Portlock PJ; School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. Electronic address: j.c.portlock@sussex.ac.uk.
  • Power A; NHS Education for Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ailsa.power@nhs.scot.
  • Addison B; School of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom. Electronic address: b.addison@rgu.ac.uk.
Am J Pharm Educ ; : 101267, 2024 Aug 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39159836
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To explore stakeholder views on structures and processes supporting planned and unplanned interprofessional education (IPE) during experiential learning (EL) placements for student pharmacists in Scotland.

METHOD:

Online semi-structured group interviews were conducted with academic staff, practice educators and EL facilitators (preceptors). Recordings were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Systems theory underpinned the study. Ethical approval was granted by the School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences Ethics Review Committee at Robert Gordon University.

RESULTS:

Three main themes were identified (1) Current IPE delivery and context (2) Factors affecting IPE delivery and student pharmacist learning and (3) Re-thinking current IPE provision. Stakeholder views provided valuable insights into presage factors relating to contextual elements - cultural, logistical, regulatory - and their influence on IPE delivery and interprofessional learning. EL facilitator and student pharmacist characteristics were also highlighted as influencing factors; process factors included examples of planned and unplanned IPE experiences on offer in community, hospital, primary care, and specialist areas of pharmacy practice; product factors highlighted the importance of IPE to support the development of collaborative competencies. Future developments need to focus on a continuum of IPE learning and a coordinated approach between higher education institutions and placement providers and interprofessional practice teams.

CONCLUSION:

Curricular development and implementation of new IPE is not without its challenges. This study has provided a strong foundation that will inform future developments, to ensure new initiatives are conducive to supporting effective interprofessional learning during placements.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Pharm Educ Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Pharm Educ Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article