Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-benefit analysis of the National Immunization Program in Spain.
Pérez, Alberto; Fernández Prada, María; Cassinello, Natalia; Vallejo-Aparicio, Laura Amanda; García, Andrea; González, Almudena; Durán, Ana; Zozaya, Néboa; Fernández, Irene; Daheron, Mathilde; Hidalgo, Álvaro; Beck, Ekkehard; García Ruiz, Antonio.
Afiliação
  • Pérez A; Management, Hospital Nuestra Señora De Sonsoles (Complejo Asistencial De Avila), Ávila, Spain.
  • Fernández Prada M; Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hospital Vital Alvarez Buylla, Asturias, Spain.
  • Cassinello N; Financial and Accounting Management, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain.
  • Vallejo-Aparicio LA; Market Access, GSK, Madrid, Spain.
  • García A; Market Access, GSK, Madrid, Spain.
  • González A; Health Economics and Market Access, Vivactis Weber, Madrid, Spain.
  • Durán A; Health Economics and Market Access, Vivactis Weber, Madrid, Spain.
  • Zozaya N; Health Economics and Market Access, Vivactis Weber, Madrid, Spain.
  • Fernández I; Health Economics and Market Access, Vivactis Weber, Madrid, Spain.
  • Daheron M; Health Economics and Market Access, Vivactis Weber, Madrid, Spain.
  • Hidalgo Á; Weber Foundation, Madrid, Spain.
  • Beck E; University of Castilla La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.
  • García Ruiz A; Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Wavre, Belgium.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2385175, 2024 Dec 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39161115
ABSTRACT
Broad benefits of vaccination programs are well acknowledged but difficult to measure, especially when considering all vaccines included in a National Immunization Program (NIP). The aim was to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of the entire NIP in Spain, and an expanded NIP including four potential additional programs. A cost-benefit analysis was performed in Excel to assess the economic and health benefits (€) of vaccinating a single cohort of newborns over a lifetime horizon compared to no vaccination, from a societal perspective firstly, according to the 2020 NIP in Spain (including 2021 recommendation for herpes zoster in 65-year-olds); and secondly, with an expanded NIP (adding rotavirus and meningococcal B in infants, and pertussis booster in adults aged >65 years and herpes zoster in all adults >50 years). The main inputs were taken from published literature and Spanish databases. Results were presented as a benefit-cost ratio (economic benefit per €1 invested). A cohort of 343,126 newborns were included in the analysis. The total investment needed to vaccinate the cohort throughout their lifetime, according to the 2020 NIP and the expanded NIP, was estimated at €168.5 million and €275.5 million, respectively. Potential economic benefits were €772.2 million and €803.0 million, respectively. The societal benefit-cost ratio was €4.58 and €2.91 per €1 invested, respectively. Even with the addition of new vaccination programs, the Spanish NIP yielded positive benefit-cost ratios from the societal perspective, demonstrating that NIPs spanning the full life course are an efficient public health measure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacinação / Análise Custo-Benefício / Programas de Imunização Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged / Newborn País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Hum Vaccin Immunother Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacinação / Análise Custo-Benefício / Programas de Imunização Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged / Newborn País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Hum Vaccin Immunother Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha País de publicação: Estados Unidos