Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The number of drones to inseminate a queen with has little potential for optimization of honeybee breeding programs.
Du, Manuel; Bernstein, Richard; Hoppe, Andreas.
Afiliação
  • Du M; Breeding and Genetics, Institute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, Hohen Neuendorf, 16540, Germany. manuel.du@hu-berlin.de.
  • Bernstein R; Breeding and Genetics, Institute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, Hohen Neuendorf, 16540, Germany.
  • Hoppe A; Breeding and Genetics, Institute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, Hohen Neuendorf, 16540, Germany.
Hereditas ; 161(1): 28, 2024 Aug 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39192380
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Mating control is a crucial aspect of honeybee breeding. Instrumental insemination of queens gives the breeder maximum control over the genetic origin of the involved drones. However, in addition to the drones' descent, the breeder's control also extends over the number of drones to use for inseminations. Thus far, this aspect has largely been ignored in attempts to optimize honeybee breeding schemes. The literature provides some comparisons between single drone inseminations (SDI) and multi drone inseminations (MDI) but it is unclear whether the number of drones used in MDI is a relevant parameter for the optimization of honeybee breeding programs.

METHODS:

By computer simulations, we investigated the effect of the number of drones per inseminated queen in breeding programs that relied on best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) breeding values. We covered a range of 1 to 50 drones per queen and observed the developments of genetic gain and inbreeding over a period of 20 years. Hereby, we focused on insemination schemes that take the drones for one queen from a single colony.

RESULTS:

SDI strategies led to 5.46% to 14.19% higher genetic gain than MDI at the cost of 6.1% to 30.2% higher inbreeding rates. The number of drones used in MDI settings had only a negligible impact on the results. There was a slight tendency that more drones lead to lower genetic gain and lower inbreeding rates but whenever more than five drones were used for inseminations, no significant differences could be observed.

CONCLUSION:

The opportunities to optimize breeding schemes via the number of drones used in inseminations are very limited. SDI can be a viable strategy in situations where breeders are interested in genetically homogeneous offspring or precise pedigree information. However, such strategies have to account for the fact that the semen from a single drone is insufficient to fill a queen's spermatheca, whence SDI queens will not build full-strength colonies. When deciding for MDI, breeders should focus on collecting enough semen for a succesful insemination, regardless of how many drones they need for this purpose.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Simulação por Computador / Cruzamento Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Hereditas Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Simulação por Computador / Cruzamento Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Hereditas Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Reino Unido