Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The doodle dilemma: How the physical health of 'Designer-crossbreed' Cockapoo, Labradoodle and Cavapoo dogs' compares to their purebred progenitor breeds.
Bryson, Gina T; O'Neill, Dan G; Brand, Claire L; Belshaw, Zoe; Packer, Rowena M A.
Afiliação
  • Bryson GT; Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
  • O'Neill DG; Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
  • Brand CL; Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
  • Belshaw Z; EviVet Evidence-Based Veterinary Consultancy, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Packer RMA; Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0306350, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39196904
ABSTRACT
Booming UK ownership of designer-crossbreed dogs resulting from intentional crossing of distinct purebred breeds is often motivated by perceived enhanced health, despite limited evidence supporting a strong 'hybrid vigour' effect in dogs. Improved evidence on the relative health of designer-crossbreed dogs could support prospective owners to make better acquisition decisions when choosing their new dog. This study used a cross-sectional survey of UK owners of three common designer-crossbreeds (Cavapoo, Cockapoo, and Labradoodle) and their progenitor breeds (Cavalier King Charles Spaniel, Cocker Spaniel, Labrador Retriever, and Poodle) to collect owner-reported health disorder information. The authors hypothesised that designer-crossbred breeds have lower odds of common disorders compared to their progenitor breeds. Multivariable analysis accounted for confounding between breeds dog age, sex, neuter status, and owner age and gender. The odds for the 57 most common disorders were compared across the three designer-crossbreeds with each of their two progenitor breeds (342 comparisons). Valid responses were received for 9,402 dogs. The odds did not differ statistically significantly between the designer-crossbreeds and their relevant progenitor breeds in 86.6% (n = 296) of health comparisons. Designer-crossbreeds had higher odds for 7.0% (n = 24) of disorders studied, and lower odds for 6.4% (n = 22). These findings suggest limited differences in overall health status between the three designer-crossbreeds and their purebred progenitors, challenging widespread beliefs in positive hybrid vigour effects for health in this emerging designer-crossbreed demographic. Equally, the current study did not suggest that designer-crossbreeds have poorer health as has also been purported. Therefore, owners could more appropriately base acquisition decisions between designer-crossbreeds and their purebred progenitors on other factors important to canine welfare such as breeding conditions, temperament, conformation and health of parents.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cruzamento Limite: Animals / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cruzamento Limite: Animals / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido País de publicação: Estados Unidos