Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pharmacopuncture therapy for adhesive capsulitis: A pragmatic randomized controlled pilot study.
Kim, Doori; Park, Kyoung Sun; Kim, Sun-A; Seo, Ji Yeon; Cho, Hyun-Woo; Lee, Yoon Jae; Yang, Changsop; Ha, In-Hyuk; Han, Chang-Hyun.
Afiliação
  • Kim D; Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park KS; Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim SA; Daejeon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Seo JY; Bucheon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho HW; Haeundae Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee YJ; Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Yang C; KM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
  • Ha IH; Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Han CH; KM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Integr Med Res ; 13(3): 101065, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39224580
ABSTRACT

Background:

Although several studies have reported the effectiveness of acupuncture treatment for adhesive capsulitis (AC), research on pharmacopuncture therapy for AC remains limited. We compared the effectiveness and safety of pharmacopuncture and physiotherapy for AC.

Methods:

This pragmatic, randomized, controlled, parallel-group pilot study enrolled patients with limitations of shoulder movement and a numeric rating scale (NRS) score for shoulder pain ≥5 randomized (11) to the pharmacopuncture therapy (PPT) and physiotherapy (PT) groups. Treatment sessions were administered twice weekly for 6 weeks, and the participants were followed up for 13 weeks after randomization. The primary outcome was the NRS score for shoulder pain, and the secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), range of motion (ROM), patient global impression of change (PGIC), EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), and Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) scores. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was set as the primary analysis.

Results:

Among 50 participants, for the primary endpoint (week 7) the PPT group showed a significantly superior improvement in NRS, VAS, SPADI, ROM for flexion, ROM for abduction, and EQ-5D-5L scores. The ROM for extension, ROM for adduction, physical component summary, and patient global impression of change were significantly better in the PPT than in the PT group, and these effects were sustained until week 13.

Conclusion:

In this pilot study, PPT showed better effects than PT, confirming the feasibility of a follow-up main study. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05292482) and cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0007198).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Integr Med Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Integr Med Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Holanda