Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A feasibility study on utilizing machine learning technology to reduce the costs of gastric cancer screening in Taizhou, China.
Yan, Si-Yan; Fu, Xin-Yu; Tang, Shen-Ping; Qi, Rong-Bin; Liang, Jia-Wei; Mao, Xin-Li; Ye, Li-Ping; Li, Shao-Wei.
Afiliação
  • Yan SY; Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Fu XY; Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
  • Tang SP; Department of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
  • Qi RB; Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
  • Liang JW; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai Zhejiang, China.
  • Mao XL; Department of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
  • Ye LP; Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques & Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
  • Li SW; Institute of Digestive Disease, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
Digit Health ; 10: 20552076241277713, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39247098
ABSTRACT

Aim:

To optimize gastric cancer screening score and reduce screening costs using machine learning models.

Methods:

This study included 228,634 patients from the Taizhou Gastric Cancer Screening Program. We used three machine learning models to optimize Li's gastric cancer screening score Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Distributed Random Forest (DRF), and Deep Learning (DL). The performance of the binary classification models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUCPR).

Results:

In the binary classification model used to distinguish low-risk and moderate- to high-risk patients, the AUC in the GBM, DRF, and DL full models were 0.9994, 0.9982, and 0.9974, respectively, and the AUCPR was 0.9982, 0.9949, and 0.9918, respectively. Excluding Helicobacter pylori IgG antibody, pepsinogen I, and pepsinogen II, the AUC in the GBM, DRF, and DL models were 0.9932, 0.9879, and 0.9900, respectively, and the AUCPR was 0.9835, 0.9716, and 0.9752, respectively. Remodel after removing variables IgG, PGI, PGII, and G-17, the AUC in GBM, DRF, and DL was 0.8524, 0.8482, 0.8477, and AUCPR was 0.6068, 0.6008, and 0.5890, respectively. When constructing a tri-classification model, we discovered that none of the three machine learning models could effectively distinguish between patients at intermediate and high risk for gastric cancer (F1 scores in the GBM model for the low, medium and high risk 0.9750, 0.9193, 0.5334, respectively; F1 scores in the DRF model for low, medium, and high risks 0.9888, 0.9479, 0.6694, respectively; F1 scores in the DL model for low, medium, and high risks 0.9812, 0.9216, 0.6394, respectively).

Conclusion:

We concluded that gastric cancer screening indicators could be optimized when distinguishing low-risk and moderate to high-risk populations, and detecting gastrin-17 alone can achieve a good discriminative effect, thus saving huge expenditures.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Digit Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Digit Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Estados Unidos