Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physician preferences for treatment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)-A discrete choice experiment.
Graf, Marlon; Khera, Amit V; May, Suepattra G; Chung, Sukyung; N'dri, Laetitia; Cristino, Joaquim; Electricwala, Batul.
Afiliação
  • Graf M; Precision AQ, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Khera AV; Division of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • May SG; Verve Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Chung S; Precision AQ, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • N'dri L; Precision AQ, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Cristino J; Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Electricwala B; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Heliyon ; 10(16): e35990, 2024 Aug 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39247312
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Approximately 80 % of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) do not achieve the guideline-based target for low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) levels in current clinical practice, particularly the 95 % of ASCVD patients receiving oral statin monotherapy. The objective was to determine physician prescribing preferences for LDL-C lowering therapies beyond statins for patients with ASCVD.

Methods:

A discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey was administered to cardiologists and primary care physicians in the United States, presenting a series of treatment choices systematically varied across 8 treatment attributes % LDL-C reduction, myalgias, other side effects, route and frequency of administration, time to prior authorization, patient monthly out-of-pocket cost (mOOP), and adherence. Data were analyzed using logistic regression to estimate preference weights for each attribute.

Results:

A total of 200 cardiologists and 50 primary care physicians (PCPs) completed the survey. Both exhibited similar prescribing preferences, highly valuing efficacy in reducing LDL-C levels and minimization of patients OOP cost. Each additional 10 % reduction in LDL-C was associated with a 69 % relative increase in physician preference. By contrast, a 10 % relative decrease in preference was observed for each $10 additional monthly mOOP. Compared to PCPs, cardiologists tended to place more emphasis on LDL-C reduction, being more willing to accept higher mOOP or side effects. Although oral therapies were preferred, injectable therapies, like the PCSK9 siRNA-like drug, administered less frequently that allowed for greater LDL-C reduction were seen as having considerable utility, especially among patients with a history of medication nonadherence.

Conclusion:

These results document considerable preference similarities among cardiologist and PCP prescribers of LDL-C lowering therapies for ASCVD. Broad availability of several therapies with varying administration frequencies and product profiles are likely of great value to prescribing physicians aiming to achieve target LDL-C concentrations. Considering all aspects of treatment, most participants preferred a PCSK9 siRNA-like drug.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Reino Unido