Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Data collection methods for patient-reported outcome measures in cancer randomised controlled trials: a protocol for a rapid scoping review.
Lehmann, Jens; Krepper, Daniela; Pe, Madeline; Kulis, Dagmara; Giesinger, Johannes M; Sztankay, Monika; Kern, Scottie; Fitzsimmons, Deborah; Holzner, Bernhard.
Afiliação
  • Lehmann J; University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria jens.lehmann@i-med.ac.at.
  • Krepper D; University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Pe M; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Kulis D; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Giesinger JM; University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Sztankay M; University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Kern S; Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment Consortium, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
  • Fitzsimmons D; Swansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
  • Holzner B; University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
BMJ Open ; 14(9): e084935, 2024 Sep 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39260865
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There are different modes and ways to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials. However, there is little systematic information on how often different modes of assessment (MOA) are used in cancer clinical trials and how exactly assessments are conducted. The goal of this scoping review is to gain an understanding of the MOA and data management of PROs in cancer randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the reporting quality thereof. METHODS AND

ANALYSIS:

This scoping review protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant trials will be identified via their indexed publications. We will search PubMed for RCTs conducted in cancer populations that evaluate a biomedical treatment with a PRO endpoint. Trials with publications published between January 2019 and November 2023 will be included. Two independent reviewers will review the references for both the abstract and full-text screening. We will extract data from the publications from a trial and the trial protocol if a protocol can be traced. Data will be summarised at the trial level. We will focus on a descriptive analysis of the MOA of PROs and on the relative frequencies of the different MOA. We will also evaluate the quality of reporting for the relevant SPIRIT and CONSORT guidelines that refer to the assessment of PROs in trials. Due to the scoping nature of our review, we will not perform a dedicated quality assessment of all trials. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The proposed review is based on secondary, published data. Hence, no ethics review is necessary. The review is part of an ongoing project on the use of electronic data capture methods in cancer clinical trials. The findings from the review will support the project and contribute to synthesising guidance to ultimately improve the (electronic) measurement of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical trials.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente / Neoplasias Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente / Neoplasias Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria País de publicação: Reino Unido