Responses to Valsalva's maneuver in spinal cord injury do not broadly relate to vasoconstrictor capacity.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A blood pressure stabilization during late phase II of Valsalva's maneuver may be utilized to confirm sympathetic vasoconstrictor control after a spinal cord injury. This study investigated whether Valsalva response was predictive of hemodynamics during tilt or isometric handgrip. METHODS: Presence/absence of Valsalva response was compared to heart rate, mean arterial pressure, leg blood flow, and vascular resistance during head-up tilt and isometric handgrip to fatigue in 14 adults with spinal cord injury from C7 to T12 and 14 controls. Statistics were performed with two-way repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA), post hoc t-tests for between-group comparisons, and Mann-Whitney U tests for within-group. RESULTS: In total, six participants with spinal cord injury lacked a blood pressure stabilization for Valsalva's maneuver. However, this was not related to vasoconstrictor responses during the other tests. The groups had similar heart rate and blood pressure changes during tilt, though leg blood flow decreases and vascular resistance increases tended to be smaller at 20° tilt in those with spinal cord injury (p = 0.07 and p = 0.11, respectively). Participants with spinal cord injury had lower heart rates and markedly smaller blood pressure increases during handgrip (both p < 0.05). There were no group differences in leg blood flow, but those with spinal cord injury demonstrated a blunted vascular resistance increase by the final 10% of the handgrip (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Valsalva response was not consistent with hemodynamics during other stimuli, but some individuals evidence increases in sub-lesional vascular resistance to isometric handgrip comparable to controls, suggesting a sympathoexcitatory stimulus may be critical to provoke hemodynamic responses after spinal cord injury.