[Prognosis in unstable angina as a function of the clinical presentation]. / Prognóstico da angina instável em função da apresentação clínica.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognosis of Unstable Angina according to its clinical presentation using Braunwald's Classification. DESIGN: Retrospective study of hospital admissions from January 1982 to September 1990. SETTING: Coronary Care Unit and a Cardiology Department of a Central Hospital. PATIENTS: There were 132 patients, 109 men and 23 women, with a mean age of 56 +/- 9 years, all submitted to cardiac catheterization at least 90 days after hospital admission followed up during 34.2 +/- 24.2 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were divided in three groups according to the clinical presentation of Unstable Angina: Group A--Aggravated Chronic Angina and/or "De Novo" Angina; Group B--Angina at Rest but not in the last 48 hours, and Group C--Angina at Rest in the last 48 hours. Group A was also sub-divided, and the patients with Unstable Angina after myocardial infarction were excluded. The previous clinical profile was evaluated as well as the circumstances in which Unstable Angina occurred, need of Coronary Care Unit, angiographic findings and follow-up. RESULTS: Within the 132 patients, 86 were in the group A, (59 with Aggravated Angina and 27 with "De Novo" Angina), 11 in group B, and 35 in group C. The group with Aggravated Angina had higher incidence of previous myocardial infarction and bypass surgery (p < 0.01 and p = 0.05), compared to group with "De Novo" Angina and B, and also three vessels disease associated to ventricular dysfunction. "Culprit Lesion" appeared more frequently as eccentric type I in group A, and as concentric in group C. Revascularization procedures were performed in 95 patients (CABG in 66 and PTCA in 29) being respectively: 21 and 6 were urgent, 19 and 18 were elective and 26 and 5 were late procedures. CABG were more frequent in group A. There were 73 major cardiac events in 44 patients (8 deaths, 12 myocardial infarction and 53 new episodes of Unstable Angina), which were more frequent in group with Aggravated Angina and group C. The chance of patients with major cardiac events was in a 78 months follow-up, about 25% for group with "De Novo" Angina, 50% for patients with Aggravated Chronic Angina, and was greater than 75% in patients with Angina at Rest and episodes in the last 48 hours (p < 0.05)--Log-rank Test. The worse prognosis was seen in patients with Aggravated Chronic Angina, when a gathering of clinic patterns of Braunwald's classification were present. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the group with Aggravated Angina and group C had more severe disease, required more urgent CABG and PTCA, and had also a higher incidence of cardiac events. The group with better prognosis was the group with "De Novo" Angina, which should be distinguished of the group with Aggravated Angina who was the worst prognosis.