Should venous surgery be still proposed or neglected?
Int J Impot Res
; 8(1): 25-8, 1996 Mar.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-8735190
ABSTRACT
Forty-four men aged 20-56 years (mean 42) complaining a venous erectile dysfunction underwent penile venous surgery. Fifteen patients (34.1%) were treated by DDVL, 29 cases (65.9%) underwent DDVL + corporopexy. All patients were followed-up at short and long-term periods. In short-term follow-up, eight patients (57.2%) of 15 treated by DDVL showed spontaneous erection, six patients (42.8%) showed persistent erectile dysfunction. In long-term follow-up, four patients of this group (28.6%) showed spontaneous erection. The others, 10 patients (71.4%), were then treated by other therapeutical alternatives. Twenty-two patients (75.8%) of 29 operated with DDVL + corporopexy showed spontaneous erection in short-term follow-up. After one year, in long-term follow-up, whereas total 15 patients (51.7%) of them were obtaining full erection, the others required other forms of treatments. In both groups in a long-term follow-up, total 19 patients of 43 (44.2%) showed full spontaneous erection, four patients (9.3%) needed intracavernous injection and six patients (13.9%) were treated with penile prosthetic implants. A total of 29 patients (67.4%) were able to have acceptable sexual intercourse. We concluded that venous surgery is still useful in selected patients having no better therapeutical alternatives.
Buscar no Google
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Pênis
/
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares
/
Impotência Vasculogênica
Tipo de estudo:
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Int J Impot Res
Assunto da revista:
MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA
/
UROLOGIA
Ano de publicação:
1996
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Itália